Motivational context determines the impact of aversive outcomes on mental effort allocation.

It is well known that people will exert effort on a task if sufficiently motivated, but how they distribute these efforts across different strategies (e.g., efficiency vs.

Learning when effort matters: neural dynamics underlying updating and adaptation to changes in performance efficacy.

To determine how much cognitive control to invest in a task, people need to consider whether exerting control matters for obtaining rewards. In particular, they need to account for the efficacy of their performance-the degree to which rewards are determined by performance or by independent factors. Yet it remains unclear how people learn about their performance efficacy in an environment.

Decomposing the motivation to exert mental effort.

Achieving most goals demands cognitive control, yet people vary widely in their success at meeting these demands. While motivation is known to be fundamental to determining these successes, what determines one's motivation to perform a given task remains poorly understood. Here, we describe recent efforts towards addressing this question using the Expected Value of Control model, which simulates the process by which people weigh the costs and benefits of exerting mental effort.

Commentary: Building the developmental foundations of developmental computational psychiatry: reflections on Hauser et al. (2019).

There is a growing interest in applying the conceptual and analytical frameworks of computational psychiatry to developmental populations. This is motivated by appreciation that psychiatric illness needs to be understood from a neurodevelopmental perspective. The target article by Hauser and colleagues highlights progress in applying the computational psychiatry perspectives to identifying the developmental mechanisms of mental illness.