Publications by authors named "Maaike J van der Veen"

Objective: Although the Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial-II (CAMERA-II) showed favorable clinical effects in the most intensive methotrexate (MTX)-based strategy with prednisone (MTX ± prednisone) compared to that with placebo (MTX + placebo), this beneficial difference was only seen in 1 of the 3 analyses of remission. Our objective was to investigate whether the Continuity Rewarded (ConRew) score and a simple sum score would better reveal differences regarding remission between the 2 treatment arms of CAMERA-II. Furthermore, we investigated whether the patient vector graph, which plots on patient level, would add visual information on remission compared to a conventional box plot only, which displays data on the group level.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study looked at how rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects people's ability to do daily activities over time, focusing on disease activity and how it's measured through different scores.
  • It found that patients getting more intense treatments experienced less decline in their abilities compared to those with less intensive treatments.
  • The results suggest that while disease activity is important to track, visible joint damage on X-rays might not always predict how well a person can function in their daily life.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Treatment strategies for tight control of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are highly effective but can be improved.

Objective: To investigate whether adding prednisone, 10 mg/d, at the start of a methotrexate (MTX)-based treatment strategy for tight control in early RA increases its effectiveness.

Design: A 2-year, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial (CAMERA-II [Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis trial-II]).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To study whether assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity in individual patients using the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) or other instruments excluding joints of feet may lead to misclassification of disease activity.

Methods: A cohort of RA patients was classified into three 'regional radiographic damage progression' groups: predominantly progression in feet, similar progression in hands and feet and predominantly progression in hands; both in early (0-2 years) and later (2-5 years) disease. Baseline and mean DAS28, individual DAS28 variables and tender joint counts (TJC) and swollen joint counts (SJC) of the feet were compared between groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the influence of tender points (TP) on the Disease Activity Score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: In 200 consecutive patients with RA from the outpatient clinic, DAS28 and its components, tender and swollen joint counts (TJC, SJC, respectively), visual analog scale (VAS) for patient's general health (GH), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), along with a tender point count (TPC) were assessed. Patients were categorized according to 4 TPC classes: zero, 1-5, 6-10, and ≥ 11 TP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate whether serum biomarker levels of C2C, C1,2C, CS846, and CPII can predict the long-term course of disease activity and radiographic progression early in the disease course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: In patients in the CAMERA trial, levels of biomarkers were evaluated at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. Relations of (changes in) biomarker values with the mean yearly radiographic progression rate and mean disease activity over a 5-year period were evaluated by using regression analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate whether the clinical advantages observed after 1 year in a randomized controlled clinical trial, in which 2 treatment strategies were compared (the early disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD] approach versus the pyramid approach), persist after 5 years.

Methods: In this study, 238 patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were randomized to either the pyramid group (n = 56) or the early DMARD group (n = 182). Patients assigned to the pyramid group received nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for at least 1 year after inclusion (the mean +/- SD lag time until first prescription of a DMARD was 14 +/- 9 months).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF