Objectives: To explore whether Alzheimer's disease patients could rate their quality of life (QOL) using utility-based health indexes, and to provide new knowledge about the measurement properties of these instruments for patient and caregiver proxy ratings.
Methods: A convenience sample of 60 mild-moderate AD patients and their caregivers were randomized to complete the Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), Health Utilities Index (HUI3) or EQ-5D and visual analogue scale (VAS) on two occasions. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients) and convergent validity (Spearman correlations) of utility scores with global health status, activities of daily living, comorbidity, mood, cognition and other utility measures were assessed.
A semi-structured interview was conducted with dementia patients and their caregivers in order to explore which aspects of quality of life were perceived as relevant and important. These aspects of quality of life were compared with the content of three generic utility-based quality of life instruments: European Quality of Life Instrument, Health Utilities Index, and Quality of Well-Being (QWB) Scale. Twenty patients with mild dementia and 20 caregiver volunteers provided narrative data derived from interviews that were analyzed using a modified Grounded Theory method of analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn assessment of decision-making capacity is the accepted procedure for determining when a person is not competent. An inferential gap exists between the criteria for capacity specific abilities and the legal requirements to understand relevant information and appreciate the consequences of a decision. This gap extends to causal influences on a person's capacity to decide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To compare results of a specific capacity assessment administered by the treating clinician, and a Standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination (SMMSE), with the results of expert assessments of patient capacity to consent to treatment.
Design: Cross-sectional study with independent comparison to expert capacity assessments.
Setting: Inpatient medical wards at an academic secondary and tertiary referral hospital.