Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the first line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), is considered effective in reducing daytime sleepiness. Its efficacy relies on adequate adherence, often defined as 4 hours per night. However, this binary threshold may limit our understanding of the causal effect of CPAP adherence and daytime sleepiness, and a multilevel approach for CPAP adherence can be more appropriate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The earliest possible detection of individuals with COVID-19 has been essential to curb the spread of infection. Existing digital tools have been scaled up to address this issue. Every night telemonitoring data on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device use, the first-line therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), is collected worldwide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The symptomatic response to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in COPD-obstructive sleep apnea overlap syndrome (OVS) compared to OSA syndrome (OSA) alone has not been well studied so far. The aim of this study is to explore main differences in the clinical response to CPAP treatment in OVS compared to OSA alone.
Study Design And Methods: Using prospective data from the French National Sleep Apnea Registry, we conducted an observational study among 6320 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, available spirometry, and at least one follow-up visit under CPAP therapy.