"It's Traumatic for All of Us": A Qualitative Analysis of Providers Caring for Seriously Ill Veterans With Surgical Conditions.

Objective: We aimed to characterize sources of moral distress among providers in the context of surgery.

Background: Moral distress is defined as psychological unease generated when professionals identify an ethically correct action to take but are constrained in their ability to take that action. While moral distress has been reported among healthcare providers, the perspectives of providers working in surgery specifically are not often explored and reported.

"You have to hold their hand": experiences of providers integrating virtual care and communication methods while caring for ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The rapid expansion of synchronous telephone and video virtual care options allowed the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to adapt to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and provided a unique opportunity to assess the potential for integration and utility of virtual care in VHA systems. The objective of this study was to highlight the perspectives of VHA providers caring for intensive care unit (ICU) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and their views on the use of virtual care and communication for palliative and end-of-life patients.

Methods: Forty-eight semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with providers between April 2021 and March 2022 and were analyzed using steps informed by thematic content analysis.

"Do No Harm?" Moral Distress Among Medical Students During the Surgical Clerkship.

Objectives: Moral distress, reported among healthcare workers across a variety of settings, is associated with negative mental health consequences, burnout, and intention to leave a position. The scant literature exploring medical students' moral distress does not specifically examine moral distress during the surgical clerkship nor does it characterize the type of moral distress experienced by medical students. Thus, we aimed to explore and characterize medical students' moral distress during the surgical clerkship.

Barriers to perioperative palliative care across Veterans Health Administration hospitals: A qualitative evaluation.

Background: Palliative care remains widely underused for surgical patients, despite a clear benefit for patients with life-limiting illness or nearing the end-of-life.

Methods: Interviews exploring end-of-life care among critically-ill surgical patients were conducted with providers from 14 pre-specified Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. Data were analyzed iteratively through steps informed by inductive and deductive descriptive content analysis.

Development and implementation of a roadmap for improving quality of care in prearthritic hip disease: A journey over 20 years.

The understanding and treatment of prearthritic hip disease has evolved remarkably over the past 20 years. The principal investigator and the multicenter Academic Network of Conservational Hip Outcomes Research (ANCHOR) group have had a key role in improving the quality of care for these patients suffering from the three most common prearthritic conditions: femoroacetabular impingement, developmental dysplasia of the hip, and residual Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease. We aim to demonstrate that based on the six quality of care dimensions as defined by Donabedian, our 20-year academic journey has markedly improved the quality of care for young patients with prearthritic hip disease.