(1)The study aimed to measure the depth, volume, and surface area of the intact human orbit by applying an automated method of CT segmentation and to evaluate correlations among depth, volume, and surface area. Additionally, the relative increases in volume and surface area in proportion to the diagonal of the orbit were assessed. (2) CT data from 174 patients were analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: In transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS), electric current is applied via two large electrodes to modulate brain activity. Computational models have shown that large electrodes produce diffuse electric fields (EFs) in the brain, which depends on individual head and brain anatomy. Recently, smaller electrodes as well as novel electrode arrangements, including high-definition TDCS (HD-TDCS) montages, have been introduced to improve the focality of EFs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) is a neuromodulation scheme that delivers a small current to the cerebellum. In this work, we computationally investigate the distributions and strength of the stimulation dosage during ctDCS with the aim of determining the targeted cerebellar regions of a group of subjects with different electrode montages.
Approach: We used a new inter-individual registration method that permitted the projection of computed electric fields (EFs) from individual realistic head models (n = 18) to standard cerebellar template for the first time.
The brain moves when the orientation of the head changes. This inter-postural motion has been shown to affect the distribution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). As CSF layer thickness affects the distribution of electric fields (EF) in non-invasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial direct current (TDCS) and magnetic (TMS) stimulation, possible differences in body position between sessions could affect the stimulation efficacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor cortical excitability are highly variable between individuals. Inter-individual differences in the electric fields generated in the brain by tDCS might play a role in the variability. Here, we explored whether these fields are related to excitability changes following anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF