This study investigated explicit and implicit motor learning, and the influence of visual working memory (VWM) and age. Sixty children and 28 adults learned a nine-button sequence task explicitly and implicitly. Performance in explicit and implicit learning improved with age.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA handwriting task was used to test the assumption that explicit learning is dependent on age and working memory, while implicit learning is not. The effect of age was examined by testing both, typically developing children (5-12 years old, n = 81) and adults (n = 27) in a counterbalanced within-subjects design. Participants were asked to repeatedly write letter-like patterns on a digitizer with a non-inking pen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Motor skills can be learned explicitly (dependent on working memory (WM)) or implicitly (relatively independent of WM). Children born very preterm (VPT) often have working memory deficits. Explicit learning may be compromised in these children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To compare age-related action planning performance on 3 different tasks, focusing on differences in task complexity.
Methods: A total of 119 participants were divided across 6 age groups (4-5, 6-7, 8-9, 10-12, 14-16, and 20-22 years). Participants performed 3 action planning tasks: the overturned cup task, the bar transport task, and the sword task.
This study compared implicit and explicit learning instructions in hand writing. Implicit learning is the ability to acquire a new skill without a corresponding increase in knowledge about the skill. In contrast, explicit learning uses declarative knowledge to build up a set of performance rules that guide motor performance or skills.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF