A template Bayesian network for combining forensic evidence on an item with an uncertain relation to the disputed activities.

Most of the forensic evidence evaluations given activity level propositions are centered around an item which is assumed to be linked to an alleged activity. However, the relation between an item of interest and an activity may be contested. This study presents a template Bayesian network (BN) for the evaluation of transfer evidence given activity level propositions considering a dispute about the relation of an item to one or more activities.

An overview of log likelihood ratio cost in forensic science - Where is it used and what values can we expect?

There is increasing support for reporting evidential strength as a likelihood ratio (LR) and increasing interest in (semi-)automated LR systems. The log-likelihood ratio cost () is a popular metric for such systems, penalizing misleading LRs further from 1 more.  = 0 indicates perfection while  = 1 indicates an uninformative system.

From data to a validated score-based LR system: A practitioner's guide.

Likelihood ratios (LRs) are a useful measure of evidential strength. In forensic casework consisting of a flow of cases with essentially the same question and the same analysis method, it is feasible to construct an 'LR system', that is, an automated procedure that has the observations as input and an LR as output. This paper is aimed at practitioners interested in building their own LR systems.

A collection of idioms for modeling activity level evaluations in forensic science.

This paper presents a collection of idioms that is useful for modeling activity level evaluations in forensic science using Bayesian networks. The idioms are categorized into five groups: cause-consequence idioms, narrative idioms, synthesis idioms, hypothesis-conditioning idioms, and evidence-conditioning idioms. Each category represents a specific modeling objective.

The evidential strength of a combination of corresponding class features in tire examination.

Tire marks are an important type of forensic evidence as they are frequently encountered at crime scenes. When the tires of a suspect's car are compared, the evidence can be very strong if so-called 'acquired features' are observed to correspond. When only 'class characteristics' such as parts of the tire pattern are observed to correspond, it is obvious that many other tires will exist that also correspond, and so this evidence is usually considered very weak or is simply ignored.