Publications by authors named "M Funabashi"

Background: Spinal manipulation (MAN) and mobilization (MOB) are biomechanically different yet both elicit pain reduction and increased range of motion. Previous investigations have focused on quantifying kinetics (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a guideline-recommended care for musculoskeletal pain taught in various undergraduate programs. Visual feedback through force-sensing tables can improve modulation of SMT force-time characteristics and, potentially, students' confidence, both factors important for clinical competence and patient outcomes. However, it is unclear if a link exists between students' confidence and ability in SMT force-time modulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This prospective, community-based, active surveillance study aimed to report the incidence of moderate, severe, and serious adverse events (AEs) after chiropractic (n = 100) / physiotherapist (n = 50) visit in offices throughout North America between October-2015 and December-2017. Three content-validated questionnaires were used to collect AE information: two completed by the patient (pre-treatment [T0] and 2-7 days post-treatment [T2]) and one completed by the provider immediately post-treatment [T1]. Any new or worsened symptom was considered an AE and further classified as mild, moderate, severe or serious.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of education and advice for adults suffering from chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) to inform WHO guidelines.
  • After reviewing over 2,500 studies, 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, indicating that education/advice can improve pain, function, and quality of life compared to no intervention.
  • Despite these improvements, the evidence supporting these benefits is considered to be of very low certainty, highlighting the need for further research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and risks of needling therapies (NT) for adults with chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) to guide WHO clinical guidelines.
  • After examining 1831 articles, 37 randomized controlled trials were included, revealing low certainty in evidence and minimal differences between NT and other treatments across most measures.
  • NT showed some positive effects on health-related quality of life and pain reduction at different time points, especially compared to no intervention and usual care, although overall, the evidence was not strong.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF