Publications by authors named "M Eldafrawy"

Purpose: To assess the influence of operator, tool, dental loupes, and tooth position on enamel loss and composite remnants after removal of composite attachments (CA) for orthodontic clear aligners. Procedure duration was also analyzed.

Materials And Methods: Eight maxillary resin dental arches with four natural teeth were placed in the right posterior sector in dental simulators, and CA was realized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) with or without aging, of four different classes of CAD-CAM ceramic and composite materials bonded with self-adhesive resin cement to titanium alloy characteristic of implant abutments.

Methods: High translucent zirconia (Katana; KAT), lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramic (IPS. emax.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate, in a prospective clinical study over 5 years with ex vivo 3D profilometry analyses, the intraoral wear of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) CAD-CAM composite restorations used in severe tooth wear treatment with the One-Step No-Prep technique.

Methods: 192 PICN (Vita Enamic) restorations on molars and premolars were included in a prospective clinical study involving patients treated according to the One-step No-prep protocol (n = 7). All patients showed clinical signs of bruxism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The purpose of this study was to characterize the homogeneity of the mechanical properties of commercial CAD-CAM composites between different blocks of the same material (interblock homogeneity) and within each block between the internal and external parts (intrablock homogeneity). Tetric CAD (TET); Katana Avencia (KAT); Cerasmart 270 (CER); Grandio (GRN) and Vita Enamic (ENA) were tested for flexural strength (σ), flexural modulus (E), flexural load energy (U) and hardness (HV). Results showed significant differences in interblock homogeneity of σ, E and U for TET, KAT, CER and ENA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) of two MDP-based composite cements and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) with third-generation zirconia CAD-CAM restorations using two different airborne-particle abrasion (AB) pressures.

Methods: Blocks were cut into prisms (n=60), split and sintered to the desired equilateral half prisms. Half-prisms were divided into two groups for AB at 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF