Publications by authors named "M C Schweda"

Background: In Germany, Eastern European live-in carers are filling a gap in home-based long-term care for older persons. As a care reality fraught with diverse problems, live-in care is an unregulated care format bordering between formal and informal structures and has so far received little attention from health services research. The aim of the qualitative study described here was to analyze the current discourses among stakeholders from care practice, politics, and associations, as well as the arguments contained therein regarding the status quo and future of live-in care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anti-racism is part of the medical professional ethos. Nevertheless, racism pervades medicine on individual, institutional, and structural levels. The concept of habitus helps to understand deficiencies in enacting anti-racism in practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Many individuals aged 80 and older do not meet the traditional criteria for successful aging (SA) as defined by Rowe and Kahn, highlighting the need for a broader, context-focused understanding, especially for this age group.
  • *A study utilizing two large surveys found that while only 9.1% of adults aged 80-84 and 0.7% of those 90+ met the classic SA criteria, a significantly higher percentage achieved SA when considering contextual factors (54.9% and 44.4%, respectively).
  • *The research suggests that enhancing community contexts can greatly improve successful aging outcomes for older adults, indicating a shift in policy focus is necessary.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Due to demographic ageing and medical progress, the number and proportion of older organ donors and recipients is increasing. At the same time, the medical and ethical significance of ageing and old age for organ transplantation needs clarification. Advanced age is associated with the frailty syndrome that has a negative impact on the success of organ transplantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF