Biological variability hampers the use of skeletal staining methods in zebrafish embryo developmental toxicity assays.

Zebrafish embryo assays are used by pharmaceutical and chemical companies as new approach methodologies (NAMs) in developmental toxicity screening. Despite an overall high concordance of zebrafish embryo assays with in vivo mammalian studies, false negative and false positive results have been reported. False negative results in risk assessment models are of particular concern for human safety, as developmental anomalies may be missed.

Modeling Ovo-vegetarian, Lacto-vegetarian, Pescatarian, and Vegan USDA Food Patterns and Assessing Nutrient Adequacy for Lactation among Adult Females.

Background: Among its recommended dietary patterns for Americans, including lactating mothers, the 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) includes a Healthy Vegetarian Dietary Pattern (HVDP). However, the DGA does not provide guidance for adapting the HVDP for vegetarians who avoid dairy (ovo-vegetarian) or eggs (lacto-vegetarian), eat fish (pescatarians), or avoid all animal foods (vegan).

Objective: To determine whether models of the HVDP for different vegetarian diets could provide sufficient nutrition during lactation, a life stage with unique nutrient needs.

Advancing the use of new approach methodologies for assessing teratogenicity: Building a tiered approach.

Many New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) have been developed for the safety assessment of new ingredients. Research into reproductive toxicity and teratogenicity is a particularly high priority, especially given their mechanistic complexity. Forty-six non-teratogenic and 39 teratogenic chemicals were screened for teratogenic potential using the in silico DART model from the OECD QSAR Toolbox; the devTox quickPredict™ (devTox assay) test and the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test (ZET).