Publications by authors named "Lydia Helena Hofmann"

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods such as paired associative stimulation (PAS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are used to modulate cortical excitability and reduce symptoms in a variety of psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have shown significant inter-individual variability in the physiological response to these techniques when they are applied over the hand representation of primary motor cortex (M1). The goal of the present study was to identify neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and neurochemical baseline characteristics that may predict response to commonly used NIBS protocols using data from a previously published study (Therrien-Blanchet et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Paired associative stimulation (PAS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are non-invasive methods used to alter brain activity, but their comparative effectiveness is still unclear.
  • A study involving 31 healthy adults tested these methods over 20 minutes, measuring their impact on brain excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
  • Results showed that while many participants responded positively to each method, none of the treatments significantly changed overall brain excitability compared to a sham stimulation, indicating varied individual responses to these protocols.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The present study aimed at investigating the long-term stability and test-retest reliability of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) measures of cortical excitability, inhibition, and facilitation in the primary motor cortex. To fulfill these aims, thirty-one healthy adults underwent four nTMS sessions, over an average one-month period. Stability and test-retest reliability statistics were computed and analyzed to produce smallest real difference statistics, which indicate the absolute variation in a measurement that is likely to be the result of error (randomness).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF