Biopreserv Biobank
February 2017
This article discusses the evolution of the University of Pittsburgh (UPitt) Health Sciences Tissue Bank (HSTB) operation and how it has successfully positioned itself, manages to sustain its value, and remains viable in today's research landscape. We describe the various components of our biobanking operation, which are valued by our researchers, thus leading to sustainability for our biorepository. Operating within the infrastructure of a large academic university, we have access to the most cutting-edge database resources for collecting, tracking, and annotating thousands of specimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe evolving nature of medicine has created new challenges in numerous aspects of the practice of pathology. The development of less invasive procedures, the generation of better diagnostic tools, and the recognition of prognostic markers have contributed to these challenges. Between 42.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContext: Diagnostic specimens in surgical pathology are, in general, becoming smaller and smaller, as minimally invasive surgical procedures are used to obtain representative tissue. Conservation and effective utilization of small biopsy tissue is therefore crucial in the pathology laboratory.
Objective: To identify potential areas where biopsy tissue may be lost in the course of processing in our university-based laboratory.
Background: Quality assurance (QA) programs in cytopathology laboratories in the USA currently primarily involve the review of Pap tests per clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988 federal regulations. A pre-signout quality assurance tool (PQAT) at our institution allows the laboratory information system (LIS) to also automatically and randomly select an adjustable percentage of non-gynecological cytopathology cases for review before release of the final report. The aim of this study was to review our experience and the effectiveness of this novel PQAT tool in cytology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe recently implemented a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool in our subspecialty-based surgical pathology practice at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. It randomly selects an adjustable percentage of cases for review by a second pathologist at the time the originating pathologist's electronic signature is entered and requires that the review be completed within 24 hours, before release of the final report. The tool replaced a retrospective audit system and it has been in successful use since January 2009.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe describe the development and testing of a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for case diagnoses that allows for the random review of a percentage of cases by a second pathologist before case verification and release of the final report. The tool incorporates the ability to record and report levels of diagnostic disagreement, reviewers' comments, and steps taken to resolve any discrepancies identified. It is expandable to allow for the review of any percentage of cases in any number of subspecialty or general pathology "benches" and provides a prospective instrument for preventing some serious errors from occurring, thereby potentially affecting patient care in addition to identifying and documenting more general process issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF