The approach angle to the interoptic triangle limits surgical workspace when targeting the contralateral internal carotid artery.

Background: The interoptic triangle (IOT) offers a key access to the contralateral carotid artery's ophthalmic segment (oICA) and its perforating branches (PB), the ophthalmic artery (OA), and the superior hypophyseal artery (SHA). It has been previously reported that the assessment of IOT's size is relevant when attempting approaches to the contralateral oICA. However, previous studies have overseen that, since the oICA is a paramedian structure and a lateralized contralateral approach trajectory is then required, the real access to the oICA is further limited by the approach angle adopted by the surgeon with respect to the IOT's plane.

Comprehensive Anatomic Assessment of Ipsilateral Pterional Versus Contralateral Subfrontal Approaches to the Internal Carotid Ophthalmic Segment: A Cadaveric Study and Three-Dimensional Simulation.

Objective: Medially pointing aneurysms of the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery (oICA) represent a neurosurgical challenge. Conventional ipsilateral approaches require internal carotid artery and optic nerve (ON) mobilization as well as anterior clinoidectomy (AC), all associated with increased surgical risk. Contralateral approaches could provide a better exposure of the superomedial aspect of the oICA, ophthalmic artery, and superior hypophyseal artery, sparing AC and internal carotid artery or ON mobilization.

A literature review concerning contralateral approaches to paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Ipsilateral approaches remain the standard technique for clipping paraclinoid aneurysms. Surgeons must however be prepared to deal with bony and neural structures restricting accessibility. The application of a contralateral approach has been proposed claiming that some structures in the region can be better exposed from this side.