Purpose: Cemiplimab is approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Solid organ transplant recipients have been excluded from immunotherapy trials, given concern for allograft rejection despite their increased risk of skin cancers. Chronic immunosuppression is necessary to prevent organ rejection but may attenuate antitumor response with PD-1 inhibitors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: With the increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it is essential to improve our understanding of immune-related adverse events (irAE). To date, most studies describing irAE have been performed in clinical trial populations, which may not be an accurate description of irAE in real-world populations. Also, identification of patients at increased risk of irAE is needed as early recognition may improve irAE outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To investigate the characteristics and risk factors for neurologic adverse events (AEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Methods: An observational, retrospective, and pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database collected between January 2014 and December 2019 was conducted. ICI-related AEs were defined as adverse reactions in patients using anti-PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and tremelimumab).
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the field of oncology moving immuno-oncology to the forefront of cancer treatment. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors can result in serious immune-related adverse events. Hematologic toxicities are rare with incidence of neutropenia from nivolumab less than 1%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
September 2003
The purpose of this study was to determine rates of divorce in parents of children with various types of craniofacial anomalies and to analyze possible confounding factors. A 29-question survey was sent to parents of all children evaluated in the Craniofacial Centre between 1992 and 1997. Parents were questioned regarding pre- and postnatal marital stability, whether the child's facial anomaly contributed to divorce, and involvement in the child's welfare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF