The dental setting is regarded as a high-risk environment for aerosol concentrations and transmission of respiratory infectious agents, especially in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although a number of approaches and practices have evolved to reduce the spread of pathogens in the dental setting, the risk of airborne infection remains a concern. Several new extraoral suction (EOS) devices have been marketed recently; further investigation is warranted to determine their clinical effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various decontamination methods and subsequent sterilization on contaminated and inoculated diamond-coated burs. One hundred forty new diamond-coated burs and 120 extracted human molars were utilized in this study. The burs were divided into 7 groups (n = 20): 1, positive control; 2, negative control; 3, new, unused burs; and 4 to 7, burs subjected to various combinations of cleaning methods (manual cleaning, use of a cleaning stone, and/or ultrasonic cleaning) after contamination.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of several methods of disinfection and sterilization of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) camera mirror sleeves (Omnicam; Dentsply Sirona).
Materials And Methods: The outer surface of seven groups of mirror sleeves were inoculated by submerging them in suspensions of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Post inoculation, the groups were decontaminated as follows: Group A: no decontamination or sterilization following inoculation (positive control); Group B: surface cleaning with a neutral soap (Dawn Dish Soap, Procter & Gamble) and water only; Group C: surface disinfection with 17% isopropanol (CaviWipes; Metrex).