Background And Objective: Adverse Childhood Experiences(ACEs) have a powerful influence on mental health, physical health, and life expectancy. Screening for ACEs and the clinician response to ACEs are critical to addressing the health and well-being of children; however, little is known about the actions clinicians take in response to ACE screening. Therefore, we aimed to examine clinician responses to ACE screening at five California pediatric clinics in a large public health care system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Despite increases in the US foreign-born population, medical education opportunities in immigrant and refugee health (IRH) remain limited. We summarize findings for published IRH curricula and offer recommendations for integrating IRH into pediatric residency programs.
Methods: We performed a literature review of articles describing the design, implementation, or assessment of IRH curricula for US-based undergraduate and graduate medical trainees.
Purpose: To understand clinician and clinical staff perspectives on the implementation of routine Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) screening in pediatric primary care.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative evaluation in 5 clinics in Los Angeles County, California, using 2 rounds of focus group discussions: during an early phase of the initiative, and 7 months later. In the first round, we conducted 14 focus group discussions with 67 participants.
Introduction: This qualitative research study explored the perspectives of adolescents, 12 to 19-years-old, and caregivers of children under 12-years-old on the acceptibility of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screenings in five pediatric clinics.
Method: A constructivist grounded theory approach was utilized. One-on-one semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 44 adolescents and 95 caregivers of children less than 12 years old.