Introduction: Buprenorphine is used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). However, therapy is often disrupted during acute pain episodes, and re-initiation is often deferred due to intolerable interruption in opioid analgesics. This case report describes a unique strategy for inducing buprenorphine without stopping opioid analgesics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrug Alcohol Depend
August 2022
Background: Buprenorphine is a life-saving treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Low-dose initiation (LDI) is an emerging buprenorphine initiation strategy that circumvents barriers associated with standard initiation. This study aims to describe tolerability and completion of LDI using intravenous (IV) buprenorphine and to define dosing protocols in a cohort of patients hospitalized in an urban academic hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFor patients with opioid use disorder transitioning from methadone or requiring opioid analgesia, initiating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder can be difficult because of the risk of precipitated withdrawal. Low-dose initiation, also known as micro-dosing, is an alternative to standard initiation. Prior studies relied on nonstandard dosing of tablets or films, patches, or buccal formulations, all of which are unavailable in many hospitals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pediatr Pharmacol Ther
January 2020
Objectives: Clinical practice guidelines for eradication of (PA) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have been established but current studies have not assessed how these guidelines translate into clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize the real-world eradication strategies, eradication rates, and microbiologic outcomes of patients with first acquisition of PA at an urban pediatric CF center.
Methods: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry was used to identify patients with CF who received care between January 2014 and September 2018 and had PA isolated from an airway culture.
Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with less time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation compared to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, it is unknown whether clinical outcomes differ between these methods of monitoring. The aim of this research was to compare the rate of venous thrombosis and bleeding events in patients that received UFH monitored by anti-Xa compared to the aPTT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Bronchial stenosis is a known complication of lung transplantation, but there are limited data regarding whether transplant recipients with bronchial stenosis develop more infectious complications than those without bronchial stenosis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center observational cohort study between January 1, 2011 and September 29, 2016 of 35 lung transplant recipients diagnosed with bronchial stenosis and a random sample of 35 lung transplant recipients without bronchial stenosis. Data collected included donor/recipient demographic and anatomic information, respiratory cultures, episodes of respiratory infections diagnosed using CDC-NNIS criteria, hospitalizations, and 1-year all-cause mortality.