How Structured Metadata Acquisition Contributes to the Reproducibility of Nanosafety Studies: Evaluation by a Round-Robin Test.

It has been widely recognized that nanosafety studies are limited in reproducibility, caused by missing or inadequate information and data gaps. Reliable and comprehensive studies should be performed supported by standards or guidelines, which need to be harmonized and usable for the multidisciplinary field of nanosafety research. The previously described minimal information table (MIT), based on existing standards or guidelines, represents one approach towards harmonization.

Digital research data: from analysis of existing standards to a scientific foundation for a modular metadata schema in nanosafety.

Background: Assessing the safety of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is an interdisciplinary and complex process producing huge amounts of information and data. To make such data and metadata reusable for researchers, manufacturers, and regulatory authorities, there is an urgent need to record and provide this information in a structured, harmonized, and digitized way.

Results: This study aimed to identify appropriate description standards and quality criteria for the special use in nanosafety.

A HET-CAM based vascularized intestine tumor model as a screening platform for nano-formulated photosensitizers.

The development of new tumor models for anticancer drug screening is a challenge for preclinical research. Conventional cell-based in vitro models such as 2D monolayer cell cultures or 3D spheroids allow an initial assessment of the efficacy of drugs but they have a limited prediction to the in vivo effectiveness. In contrast, in vivo animal models capture the complexity of systemic distribution, accumulation, and degradation of drugs, but visualization of the individual steps is challenging and extracting quantitative data is usually very difficult.