Purpose: A novel attachment system for implant-retained overdentures (IRODs) with novel material combinations for improved mechanical resilience and prosthodontic success (Novaloc) has been recently introduced as an alternative to an existing system (Locator). This study investigated whether differences between the Novaloc and Locator attachment systems translate into differences in implant survival, implant success, and patient-centered outcomes when applied in a real-world in-practice comparative setting in patients restored with mandibular IRODs supported by 2 interforaminal implants (2-IRODs).
Methods: This prospective, intra-subject crossover comparison compared 20 patients who received 2 intra-foraminal bone level tapered implants restored with full acrylic overdentures using either the Locator or Novaloc attachment system.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare passive tactile sensibility of natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.
Material And Methods: Twenty-nine patients (17 males and 12 females) were included in the study. Natural teeth were subdivided into two groups: non endodontically treated teeth (NETT) and endodontically treated teeth (ETT).
Prosthetic treatment frequently involves the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT), which in turn implies that there has been a reduction of the crown due to previous restorative treatment, trauma and/or endodontic manipulations. The prognosis of a restored ETT is very much dependent on pre-endodontic status of the tooth, the quality of the endodontic treatment, the amount remaining tooth structure and the bone support. The aim of this study is to measure fracture resistance of extracted premolar teeth restored with 2 different diameter posts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF