Publications by authors named "Liesbeth Eloot"

Introduction: Cardiac catheterization procedures result in high patient radiation exposure and corresponding staff doses are reported to be among the highest for medical staff. The purpose of current randomized controlled study was to quantify the potential radiation dose reduction for both patient and staff, enabled by recent X-ray technology. This technology is equipped with advanced image processing algorithms, real-time dose monitoring, and an acquisition chain optimized for cardiac catheterization applications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the organ doses and lifetime-attributable risk of cancer for electrocardiogram-triggered sequential and high-pitch helical scanning in a clinical patient population.

Methods: Phantom thermoluminiscence dosimeter measurements were used as a model for the organ dose assessment of 314 individual patients who underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography. Patient-specific lifetime-attributable cancer risks were calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantify the reduction in patient radiation dose during coronary angiography (CA) by a new X-ray technology, and to assess its impact on diagnostic image quality.

Background: Recently, a novel X-ray imaging technology has become available for interventional cardiology, using advanced image processing and an optimized acquisition chain for radiation dose reduction.

Methods: 70 adult patients were randomly assigned to a reference X-ray system or the novel X-ray system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study aimed to compare patient-specific organ doses and cancer risks between 3D-rotational angiography and traditional single-plane coronary angiography.
  • Findings showed that rotational angiograms reduce radiation exposure significantly, with KAP-values decreasing by 33% and peak skin doses dropping from 172 mGy to 80 mGy.
  • Overall, using 3D imaging also led to a decrease in contrast medium usage and a cancer risk reduction of 21% for males and 50% for females.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF