The bioequivalence study design recommendations for immediate-release solid oral dosage forms in the international pharmaceutical regulators programme participating regulators and organisations: differences and commonalities.

Bioequivalence (BE) studies are considered the standard for demonstrating that the performance of a generic drug product in the human body is sufficiently similar to that of its comparator product. The objective of this article is to describe the recommendations from participating Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) members of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme (IPRP) regarding the conduct and acceptance criteria for BE studies of immediate release solid oral dosage forms. A survey was conducted among BEWGG members regarding their BE recommendations and requirements related to study subjects, study design, sample size, single or multiple dose administration, study conditions (fasting or fed), analyte to be measured, selection of product strength, drug content, handling of endogenous substances, BE acceptance criteria, and additional design aspects.

The role of partial area under the curve and maximum concentrations in assessing the bioequivalence of long-acting injectable formulation of exenatide_A sensitivity analysis.

To ensure therapeutic equivalence between the long-acting injectable (LAI) products, additional PK metrics other than C and AUC were considered necessary. However, regarding the selection of additional PK metrics for bioequivalence (BE) assessment of exenatide LAI, a discrepancy existed between EMA's and USFDA's product-specific guidance. The EMA recommends that both the maximum plasma concentration in the initial-release phase (C) and the extended-release phase (C) should be determined.

A Survey of Population Pharmacokinetic Reports Submitted to the USFDA: An Analysis of Common Issues in NDA and BLA from 2012 to 2021.

Background And Objective: Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis is one of the important components of regulatory submission. The purpose of this study was to survey PopPK analysis reports in new drug applications (NDAs) and biological licensing applications (BLAs) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and to retrieve the information regarding PopPK-related issues in the US FDA review reports.

Methods: We surveyed NDAs and BLAs over the period from 2012 to 2022 from Drug@FDA databases and extracted the review reports from the website.

A Survey of the Criteria Used for the Selection of Alternative Comparator Products by Participating Regulators and Organizations of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme.

The safety and efficacy of a generic product are partly based on demonstrating bioequivalence to the innovator product; however, when the innovator product is no longer available as a comparator product, a survey conducted within the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme (IPRP) indicated that the criteria for selecting an alternative comparator product varies. For most members of the BEWGG, an existing marketed generic that was approved based on a comparison with the locally registered innovator product can be used, contingent on criteria that ranges from allowing any generic to be used, to allowing only specific criteria-defined generics to be used. Notwithstanding the acceptability of a generic as an alternative comparator, it is not always the preferred comparator for several jurisdictions.

Investigation of the discriminatory ability of analytes for the bioequivalence assessment of ezetimibe: Parent drug, metabolite, total form, and combination of parent drug and total form.

The analysis of parent drug is usually the design of choice for a bioequivalence (BE) study. However, there is a controversy regarding the choice of analytes between EMA and USFDA for the BE study of ezetimibe (EZE). The EMA recommends measuring the total form alone, that means the sum of the concentration of "parent" EZE and "metabolite" ezetimibe-glucuronide (EZEG), as the BE determination.

Requirements for Additional Strength Biowaivers for Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms in International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme Participating Regulators and Organisations: Differences and Commonalities.

This article describes an overview of waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies for additional strengths in the context of the registration of modified release generic products and is a follow-up to the recent publication for the immediate release solid oral dosage forms. The current paper is based on a survey among the participating members of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Program (IPRP) regarding this topic. Most jurisdictions consider the extrapolation of bioequivalence results obtained with one (most sensitive) strength of a product series as less straightforward for modified release products than for immediate release products.

Model-based simulation to support the extended dosing regimens of atezolizumab.

Purpose: The currently recommended dosages of atezolizumab for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) is 840 mg every 2 weeks, 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w), and 1680 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). However, it has been argued that these dosages may not be optimal. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of extended dosing regimens by population pharmacokinetics (PK) simulations and exposure-response (E-R) relationships.

Analysis of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Parameters in EU- Versus US-Licensed Reference Biological Products: Are In Vivo Bridging Studies Justified for Biosimilar Development?

Background: Bridging studies are mandatory in the EU and USA if the reference biological product used in the biosimilar comparability exercise is foreign sourced. However, it has been argued that the duplication of bridging studies may limit biosimilar development.

Objective: The aim of the study was to explore whether it is necessary to conduct pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) bridging studies for biosimilars.

Approval of modified-release products by FDA without clinical efficacy/safety studies: A retrospective survey from 2008 to 2017.

In principle, approval of a modified-release (MR) drug product is based on evidence from pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic studies and clinical efficacy/safety studies. The purpose of this survey is (i) to explore the number of new drug applications (NDAs) of MR drug products, approved by the FDA, employ the PK study as a bridge to already-approved immediate-release drug products without conducting their own clinical efficacy/safety studies; and (ii) to understand the type of PK studies are required for such NDAs. To this end, we surveyed the approved records of MR drug products from 2008 to 2017 from the Drug@FDA website, and filtered pertinent information from FDA's assessment reports.

Investigation of the Discriminatory Ability of Pharmacokinetic Metrics for the Bioequivalence Assessment of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to construct a population pharmacokinetic model for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and use the final model to investigate the discrimination performance of pharmacokinetic metrics (e.g., C, AUC and partial AUC) of various analytes (e.

Evaluating the Feasibility of Use of a Foreign Reference Product for Generic Drug Applications: A Retrospective Pilot Study.

Background And Objectives: The adoption of a domestic reference product in bioequivalence (BE) studies for generic drug applications is required by some countries. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of this by investigating whether innovative products from different countries are bioequivalent.

Methods: Data were collected from all generic drug applications received by the Taiwan regulatory authority 2012-2016.

Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background/purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) alters the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vancomycin in neonates; but data on adults is limited.

Methods: This is a prospective, matched cohort, single center, pharmacokinetic study. For each adult patient who received vancomycin therapy in the ECMO group (with either centrifugal pump or roller pump), a control patient was matched by age (≥ 60 years or < 60 years), gender, and creatinine clearance (CLCr) in intensive care units.

A statistical analysis to assess the most critical bioequivalence parameters for generic liposomal products.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to identify the most sensitive analyte (i.e., encapsulated, free, and total forms) for assessing the bioequivalence (BE) of liposome drug products using Monte Carlo simulation.

Evaluation of etanercept dose reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation.

Objectives: In this study, we attempt to explore the feasibility of alternative dosing regimens of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling and simulation.

Methods: All data used for estimation of PK/PD model parameters were collected from previously published literatures. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rate and a disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) was selected as the principal clinical endpoint for further PK/PD modeling.