The aim of this study was to compare the seasonal variation in performance of a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) and a guaiac test (gFOBT) for colorectal cancer screening. From June 2009 to May 2011, 18,290 screening participants (50-74 years old) performed OC-SENSOR quantitative FIT (1 sample) and Hemoccult II gFOBT (3 stool samples with 2 spots/sample). Referral for colonoscopy required a minimum of one positive spot (gFOBT), or a positive FIT [cut-off 150 ng haemoglobin/mL buffer (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground & Aims: Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) identify individuals with colorectal cancer with greater levels of accuracy than guaiac tests. We compared the performances of 2 FITs in a population undergoing screening for colorectal cancer.
Methods: We collected fecal samples from 19,797 individuals in France (age, 50-74 y) who participated in a colorectal cancer screening program, from June 2009 through May 2011.
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (G-FOBT), with that of three immunochemical faecal occult blood tests (I-FOBT) which allow automatic interpretation.
Patients And Methods: Under the French organised screening programme, 85,149 average-risk individuals aged 50-74 participating in the third screening round, performed both the G-FOBT (Hemoccult-II test) and one of the I-FOBTs: FOB-Gold, Magstream and OC-Sensor.
Results: Given the chosen threshold, the positivity ratio between the different I-FOBTs and the G-FOBT was 2.
Background: Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have greater sensitivity for colorectal cancer screening than guaiac-based tests; however the number of positive tests required is still under discussion.
Methods: A direct comparison of Hemoccult II with two immunochemical quantitative tests (OC-Sensor and FOB-Gold) using a 2-sample strategy was performed in over 30,000 patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening in France.
Results: Positivity ratio between immunochemical tests and Hemoccult II varied between 2.
Background: Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests perform as well with either one or two samples, and better than guaiac tests with 6 samples.
Aims: Clarifying relationship between tests' performance, bleeding pattern and observation level.
Methods: The data of 32,225 average-risk subjects who performed both Hemoccult II (guaiac) and Magstream (immunochemical) tests were re-analysed by varying the cutoff and number of samples of Magstream.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
July 2011
Background: The superiority of several immunochemical fecal occult blood tests (I-FOBT) over guaiac-based tests in colorectal cancer screening is now established. The aim of this study was to compare the analytical performance of 3 quantitative I-FOBTs.
Methods: Stool samples from 10 healthy volunteers, initially I-FOBT negative, supplemented with human blood, were used to compare reproducibility and stability of measurement at varying storage temperatures (4°C, 10°C, 20°C, and 30°C) and durations before test analysis (1 to 10 days) for 3 I-FOBTs (New Hemtube/Magstream HT, OC-Auto sampling bottle3/OC-Sensor DIANA, and FOB Gold/SENTiFOB).
Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests (I-FOBT) detect more effectively advanced neoplasia than guaiac tests (G-FOBT). The study aim was to compare the performance of an I-FOBT whilst varying the positivity threshold and considering four analysis modalities: one sample was performed (MG(1)), two samples were performed and at least one sample was positive (MG(2+)), both samples were positive (MG(2++)) or the mean of the two samples' log-transformed haemoglobin contents exceeded the cutoff (MG(2m)). Screening for colorectal cancer using both G-FOBT and two samples' I-FOBT was performed by an average-risk population sample of 20,322 subjects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe investigated variations in sensitivity of an immunochemical (I-FOBT) and a guaiac (G-FOBT) faecal occult blood test according to type and location of lesions in an average-risk 50- to 74-year-old population. Screening for colorectal cancer by both non-rehydrated Haemoccult II G-FOBT and Magstream I-FOBT was proposed to a sample of 20 322 subjects. Of the 1615 subjects with at least one positive test, colonoscopy results were available for 1277.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Microbiol
August 2000
We report the case of an occasional intravenous drug user who developed two successive hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The first infection led to seroconversion (anti-HCV antibodies detected) and the detection of HCV RNA in serum. After a spontaneous recovery (normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels and HCV RNA clearance), a second HCV infection was observed, with the recurrence of HCV viremia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPathol Biol (Paris)
May 1999
714 pneumococcus were listed from 14 laboratories between the 1 June 1997 and the 31 May 1998. Data capture was done on Epi info software and concerned age, file number, consultation/hospitalization, sample type, susceptibility to oxacilline (5 micrograms), the results of the E-test for penicillin G, amoxicillin, cefotaxime and the results of the routine disk diffusion susceptibility method. Strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G (PRSP) were collected by the coordinating center to perform MICs by the reference method of agar dilution and serotyping.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCentral Nervous System (CNS) involvement, whether primary by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus--HIV--itself, or secondary (toxoplasmosis or lymphoma) is remarkably frequent in AIDS, in 40 to 70% of cases, depending upon the author. In order to study the natural history of this illness, a cohort of 25 asymptomatic seropositive patients have been established. Every 6 months these patients undergo biological and clinical examinations, as well as Magnetic Resonance brain scans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe mean-term physiological effects of brassidic acid (n-9, trans docosenoic acid) and of erucic acid (n-9, cis docosenoic acid) have been compared to those of their C 18 homologues, elaidic and oleic acid, in a 2(3) factorial experiment; the 3 tested factors are: 1) the chain length of the dietary monoenes (C 22:1 vs. C 18:1), 2) the geometrical configuration of their double bond (trans vs. cis) and 3) the dietary level of linoleic acid (30% vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFC R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D
October 1977
C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D
February 1974
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil
November 1972
C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D
June 1972
C R Seances Soc Biol Fil
October 1973