Introduction: Small molecules often bind to multiple targets, a behavior termed polypharmacology. Anticipating polypharmacology is essential for drug discovery since unknown off-targets can modulate safety and efficacy - profoundly affecting drug discovery success. Unfortunately, experimental methods to assess selectivity present significant limitations and drugs still fail in the clinic due to unanticipated off-targets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatents tend to define a huge chemical space described by the combinatorial nature of Markush structures. However, the optimization of new principal active ingredient is frequently driven by a simple Free Wilson approach. This procedure leads to a highly focused study on the chemical space near a hit compound leaving many unexplored regions that may present highly biological active reservoirs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMost of the product patents claim a large number of compounds based on a Markush structure. However, the identification and optimization of new principal active ingredients is frequently driven by a simple Free Wilson approach, leading to a highly focused study only involving the chemical space nearby a hit compound. This fact raises the question: do the tested compounds described in patents really reflect the full molecular diversity described in the Markush structure? In this study, we contrast the performance of rational selection to conventional approaches in seven real-case patents, assessing their ability to describe the patent's chemical space.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF