Strengthening the community governance of healthcare services in 'fragile' settings: Evidence from Burundi and South Kivu, DR Congo.

Community governance, the direct (co-)management of public services by community members, is a popular approach to improve the quality of, and access to, healthcare services-including in so-called 'fragile' states. The effectiveness of such approach is, however, debated, and scholars and practitioners have emphasised the need to properly reflect on the contextual features that may influence social accountability interventions. We study a randomised intervention during which community-elected health facility committee members were trained on their roles and rights in the co-management of primary healthcare facilities.

When information is not power: Community-elected health facility committees and health facility performance indicators.

Health Facility Committees (HFCs) made of elected community members are often presented as key for improving the delivery of services in primary health-care facilities. They are expected to help Health Facility (HF) staff make decisions that best serve the interests of the population. More recently, Performance-Based Financing (PBF) advocates have also put the HFC at the core of health reform, expecting it to hold HF staff into account for the HF performances and development.

[Good governance in the Burundi health sector financial reform].

Introduction: Burundi introduced free healthcare for children under five and pregnant women in 2006. In 2010, this was linked to the Performance-Based Financing (PBF) approach. This article is designed to identify factors in these health financing reforms that have contributed to good governance in the health sector.