The Problem of Cancer Drugs Costs: A Payer Perspective.

Chemotherapy and supportive drugs constitute 70% of a cancer patient's medical costs during active therapy. Payers use several approaches to keep those costs affordable including paying lower margins for "buy and bill" oncologists, prior authorization, pathways, or performance-based compensation. Payers also utilize financial tools such as deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance to shift more of the cost of health care coverage to employees or the insured.

Policy Challenges and Opportunities to Address Changing Paradigms in Cancer Care Delivery.

Multiple factors are forcing the healthcare delivery system to change. A movement toward value-based payment models is shifting these systems to team-based integration and coordination of care for better efficiencies and outcomes. Workforce shortages are stressing access and quality of care for patients with cancer and survivors, and their families and caregivers.

How Should We Intervene on the Financial Toxicity of Cancer Care? One Shot, Four Perspectives.

The median price of a month of chemotherapy has increased by an order of magnitude during the past 20 years, far exceeding inflation over the same period. Along with rising prices, increases in cost sharing have forced patients to directly shoulder a greater portion of those costs, resulting in undue financial burden and, in some cases, cost-related nonadherence to treatment. What can we do to intervene on treatment-related financial toxicity of patients? No one party can single-handedly solve the problem, and the solution must be multifaceted and creative.

Transforming Prior Authorization to Decision Support.

Purpose: To evaluate a computer-based prior authorization system that was designed to include and test two new concepts for physician review: (1) the tool would minimize denials by providing real-time decision support with alternative options if the original request was noncompliant, and (2) the tool would collect sufficient information to create a patient registry.

Methods: A new prior authorization tool incorporating real-time decision support was tested with a large national payer. The tool used the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology as the content for decision making.

Those Who Pay Have a Say: A View on Oncology Drug Pricing and Reimbursement.

Four recommendations are made to address the high costs of cancer therapy: remove coverage mandates from state and federal insurance law, create performance transparency for drug regimens, cap profit margins for administering drugs, and place every patient with a genetic mutation in a clinical trial.

The patient-centered medical home in oncology: from concept to reality.

In recent years, the cost of providing quality cancer care has been subject to an epic escalation causing concerns on the verge of a health care crisis. Innovative patient-management models in oncology based on patient-centered medical home (PCMH) principles, coupled with alternative payments to traditional fee for service (FFS), such as bundled and episodes payment are now showing evidence of effectiveness. These efforts have the potential to bend the cost curve while also improving quality of care and patient satisfaction.

Myths and realities in cancer care: another point of view.

Cancer care is advancing, and the cancer community is right to celebrate that progress. Simultaneously, however, the cost of cancer therapy is rising along with all medical costs. In a matter of just a few years, the cost of health coverage is projected to reach heights that are simply unsustainable for most American families, overshadowing every other daily expense.

Changing physician incentives for affordable, quality cancer care: results of an episode payment model.

Purpose: This study tested the combination of an episode payment coupled with actionable use and quality data as an incentive to improve quality and reduce costs.

Methods: Medical oncologists were paid a single fee, in lieu of any drug margin, to treat their patients. Chemotherapy medications were reimbursed at the average sales price, a proxy for actual cost.

Practice-Changing Strategies to Deliver Affordable, High-Quality Cancer Care: Summary of an Institute of Medicine Workshop.

The authors summarize presentations and discussion from the Delivering Affordable Cancer Care in the 21st Century workshop and focus on proposed strategies to improve the affordability of cancer care while maintaining or improving the quality of care.

Tying payment incentives to quality measurement.

The most important lesson from this program has been that collaboration, data, and measured performance are all possible for cancer care.

Roundtable--the changing oncology landscape: evolution or revolution?

Complex challenges face all players in the oncology landscape, from health care policy leaders and third-party payers, to practicing physicians and nurses, to patients and their families. In these unsteady economic times, possible answers proposed by some may represent part of the problem to others. A distinguished panel assembled at the NCCN 18th Annual Conference: Advancing the Standard of Cancer Care to explore the changing oncology landscape.

Unsupported off-label chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer.

Background: Newer systemic therapies have the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality from metastatic colorectal cancer, yet such therapies are costly and have side effects. Little is known about their non-evidence-based use.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using commercial insurance claims from UnitedHealthcare, and identified incident cases of metastatic colon cancer (mCC) from July 2007 through April 2010.

Defining Value in Cancer Care: AVBCC 2012 Steering Committee Report.

Approximately 200 oncologists, payers, employers, managed care executives, pharmacy benefit managers, and other healthcare stakeholders convened in Houston, TX, on March 28-31, 2012, for the Second Annual Conference of the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care (AVBCC). The mission of the conference was to align the various perspectives around the growing need of defining value in cancer care and developing strategies to enhance patient outcomes. The AVBCC conference presented a forum for the various viewpoints from all the stakeholders across the cancer care continuum, featuring more than 20 sessions and symposia led by nearly 30 oncology leaders.

Changing physician incentives for cancer care to reward better patient outcomes instead of use of more costly drugs.

More-sophisticated chemotherapy regimens have improved the outlook for cancer patients since the 1970s, but the payment system for cancer chemotherapy has not changed during that time span. The "buy and bill" approach for reimbursement provides incentives for medical oncologists to use expensive medications when less costly alternatives that deliver similar results are available. Furthermore, the system does nothing to assess how much value society derives from high-price drugs.