Team management in complex posterior spinal surgery allows blood loss limitation.

Purpose: The objective is to analyse peri-operative blood loss (BL) and hidden blood loss (HBL) rates in spinal deformity complex cases surgery, with a focus on the strategies to prevent major bleeding.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed surgical and anaesthesiologic data of patients who had been operated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) or adult spinal deformities (ASD) with a minimum of five levels fused. A statistical comparison among AIS, ASD without a pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) (ASD-PSO( -)) and ASD with PSO (ASD-PSO( +)) procedures was performed with a view to identifying patient- and/or surgical-related factors affecting peri-operative BL and HBL.

Original Surgical Treatment and Long-term Follow-up for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy Causing a Compressive Cervical Myelopathy: Review of the Literature.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic relapsing disease of unknown aetiology. The diagnosis of this disease is still very complicated. The treatment is medical but, in some cases, a surgical decompression might be required.

How good are the outcomes of instrumented debulking operations for symptomatic spinal metastases and how long do they stand? A subgroup analysis in the global spine tumor study group database.

Background: The benefits of surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have been demonstrated, largely based on series of patients undergoing debulking and instrumentation operations. However, as cancer treatments improve and overall survival lengths increase, the incidence of recurrent spinal cord compression after debulking may increase. The aim of the current paper is to document the postoperative evolution of neurological function, pain, and quality of life following debulking and instrumentation in the Global Spine Tumor Study Group (GSTSG) database.

A novel risk calculator to predict outcome after surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases; use of a large prospective patient database to personalise surgical management.

Aim: Surgery for spinal metastases can improve symptoms, but sometimes complications can negate the benefits. Operations may have different indications, complexities and risks, and the choice for an individual is a tailor-made personalised decision. Previous prognostic scoring systems are becoming out of date and inaccurate.

Loss of Local Tumor Control After Index Surgery for Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: As survival after treatment for symptomatic spinal metastases increases, the incidence of local tumor recurrence also may increase. However, data regarding incidence and timing of recurrence or duration of survival after second surgeries are not readily available and may help to inform clinicians when to perform second surgeries.

Objective: To identify features associated with loss of local control (LLC) at a previously treated or new spinal level.

Characteristics of Patients Who Survived < 3 Months or > 2 Years After Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Can We Avoid Inappropriate Patient Selection?

Purpose: Survival after metastatic cancer has improved at the cost of increased presentation with metastatic spinal disease. For patients with pathologic spinal fractures and/or spinal cord compression, surgical intervention may relieve pain and improve quality of life. Surgery is generally considered to be inappropriate if anticipated survival is < 3 months.

Rapid improvements in pain and quality of life are sustained after surgery for spinal metastases in a large prospective cohort.

Introduction Metastatic spinal cancer is a common condition that may lead to spinal instability, pain and paralysis. In the 1980s, surgery was discouraged because results showed worse neurological outcomes and pain compared with radiotherapy alone. However, with the advent of modern imaging and spinal stabilisation techniques, the role of surgery has regained centre stage, though few studies have assessed quality of life and functional outcomes after surgery.

Prediction of Quality of Life and Survival After Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Determine Suitability for Surgical Treatment.

Background: Surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases aims to improve quality of life, pain, function, and stability. Complications in the postoperative period are not uncommon; therefore, it is important to select appropriate patients who are likely to benefit the greatest from surgery. Previous studies have focused on predicting survival rather than quality of life after surgery.

Cervical and thoracic spine tumor management: surgical indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Since the first pioneering work in the area of tumors of the spine, medical professionals have sought to determine the proper role of spine surgery in the management of spinal tumors. Experience has proven that spine surgery is effective in the treatment of spinal cord compression for decreasing pain and improving quality of life with low rates of surgical complications. We use several staging systems to assess the patient's prognosis, to determine the best type of tumoral resection in preoperative surgical planning, and to provide guidance as to the best therapeutic option for the patient.

Results of treatment of septic knee arthritis: a retrospective series of 40 cases.

We studied a consecutive series of 40 patients presenting a septic knee arthritis, with a mean age of 49 +/- 20 (range 19-81) years. The aetiologies were: 18 postoperative arthritis, 12 haematogenous infections, 7 arthritis following aspiration or infiltration, and 3 articular wounds. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis (23 cases).

Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation device: three different strength tests.

Disadvantages of thoracic posterior implants and developments in rod contouring in situ led to the design of a new spinal implant: the bipedicular spinal fixation device (BSF). The BSF is composed of two bifid hooks linked by a compression transverse connector and inserted into the costo-vertebral and costo-transverse joints. The aim of this biomechanical study was to determine the loading tolerance of the BSF.

Biomechanical evaluation of a bipedicular spinal fixation system: a comparative stiffness test.

Study Design: This biomechanical study using cadaver thoracic spines evaluated the initial stiffness of two different fixation constructs using a new spinal implant: the bipedicular spinal fixation device (BSF).

Objective: To compare the biomechanical stiffness of a new construct using BSF with a regular construct using pedicular and laminar hooks.

Summary Of Background Data: Disadvantages of thoracic posterior implants and developments in in situ rod contouring led to the creation of a new implant for spine deformity surgery that would provide immediate stiffness to preserve spine correction, allow efficient postoperative rehabilitation, and obtain a good fusion rate.