Publications by authors named "Lauren E Sullivan"

Objective: The surgical management of craniosynostosis varies without consensus on technique or standard outcomes reporting. The authors of this study aimed to investigate current surgical management of craniosynostosis in the United States.

Methods: Two hundred seventy-five surgeons actively treating craniosynostosis in the United States were surveyed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Zone 2 of the hand, which stretches from the region between the A1 pulley at the distal palmar crease to the insertion of the FDS tendon at the end of the A4 pulley, is notable for its high complication rate following surgery. Many of these complications, such as adhesions, contractures, and tendon rupture, can be avoided through adequate rehabilitation. We document the rehabilitation protocol at Vanderbilt University Medical center, which is characterized by 4 phases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, which can lead to abnormal skull shape and restricted skull growth. Although most cases are present in isolation, some are associated with genetic syndromes, such as Pfeiffer, Muenke, Couzon, Apert, and others, which increases the complexity of care. Today, a spectrum of surgical options to treat craniosynostosis are available and range from traditional open cranial vault remodeling to newer and less invasive suturectomy-based techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Concrete, data-driven guidelines for breast cancer screening among the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population is lacking. The present study evaluates possible associations of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on incidental breast pathology findings in trans-masculine patients to inform decision making about breast cancer screening.

Patients And Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had gender-affirming mastectomy or breast reduction at a single center from July 2019 to February 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates how tasks that require attention affect the production of clear and loud speech compared to habitual speech.
  • It finds that while engaging in a tracking task, habitual speech quality suffers, but clear and loud speech still retain better intensity and range of motion.
  • The findings suggest that speaking loudly and clearly can help reduce the negative impact on speech production when multitasking, but these speaking styles may demand more attention, leading to reduced performance on the tracking task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF