Correction to: Comparative Human Factors Evaluation of Two Nasal Naloxone Administration Devices: NARCAN Nasal Spray and Naloxone Prefilled Syringe with Nasal Atomizer.

Under section "Introduction", the first sentence in the 4th paragraph was incorrectly published. The correct sentence is given below.

Comparative Human Factors Evaluation of Two Nasal Naloxone Administration Devices: NARCAN Nasal Spray and Naloxone Prefilled Syringe with Nasal Atomizer.

Introduction: Opioid overdose rescue situations are time-critical, high-stress scenarios that frequently require nonmedical first responders or bystanders to intervene and administer naloxone to avoid opioid-induced fatalities. Training nonmedical personnel to respond during such mentally constraining situations presents the human factors challenge of how best to design a safe and effective lay delivery system. This paper comparatively evaluates the ease of use of two nasal naloxone administration products: NARCAN Nasal Spray and a naloxone prefilled syringe with nasal atomizer (PFS-NA).

Historiography, affect, and the neurosciences.

Recent historiography has put to rest debates over whether to address the neurosciences. The question is how? In this article, I stage a dialogue between neurohistory and the history of the emotions. My primary goal is to survey these two clusters and clarify their conceptual commitments.