Publications by authors named "L R Rhomberg"

Article Synopsis
  • The text discusses the need for a thorough evaluation of available evidence to assess potential human health risks from various environmental agents, emphasizing the importance of integrating data from different sources in risk assessments.
  • It summarizes key discussions from an international workshop involving experts from different sectors who aimed to develop an evidence-based risk assessment framework that accurately reflects human health risks and uncertainties.
  • While the workshop did not aim for complete consensus, participants generally agreed on important considerations for incorporating modern scientific approaches into risk assessment, leading to the creation of a prototype framework for further exploration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Steering Committee of the Alliance for Risk Assessment (ARA) opened a call for scientists interested in resolving what appeared to be a conundrum in estimating of the half-life of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in humans. An Advisory Committee was formed from nominations received and a subsequent invitation led to the development of three small independent working groups to review appropriate information and attempt a resolution. Initial findings were shared among these groups and a conclusion developed from the ensuing discussions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Reducing chemical pressure on human and environmental health is an integral part of the global sustainability agenda. Guidelines for deriving globally applicable, life cycle based indicators are required to consistently quantify toxicity impacts from chemical emissions as well as from chemicals in consumer products. In response, we elaborate the methodological framework and present recommendations for advancing near-field/far-field exposure and toxicity characterization, and for implementing these recommendations in the scientific consensus model USEtox.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Our understanding of the etiology of cancer has developed significantly over the past fifty years, beginning with a single-hit linear no-threshold (LNT) conceptual model based on early studies conducted in Drosophila. Over the past several decades, multiple lines of evidence have accumulated to support a contemporary model of chemical carcinogenesis: a multi-hit model involving a prolonged stress environment that over time may drive the mutation of multiple cells into an injured state that ultimately could lead to uncontrolled proliferation via clonal expansion of mutation-carrying daughter cells. Arsenic carcinogenicity offers a useful case study for further exploration of advanced conceptual models for chemical carcinogenesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF