In a recent set of modeling studies we have developed a stochastic threshold model of auditory nerve response to single biphasic electrical pulses (Bruce et al., 1999c) and moderate rate (less than 800 pulses per second) pulse trains (Bruce et al., 1999a).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMost models of auditory nerve response to electrical stimulation are deterministic, despite significant physiological evidence for stochastic activity. Furthermore, psychophysical models and analyses of physiological data using deterministic descriptions do not accurately predict many psychophysical phenomena. In this paper we investigate whether inclusion of stochastic activity in neural models improves such predictions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIEEE Trans Biomed Eng
June 1999
The single-pulse model of the companion paper [1] is extended to describe responses to pulse trains by introducing a phenomenological refractory mechanism. Comparisons with physiological data from cat auditory nerve fibers are made for pulse rates between 100 and 800 pulses/s. First, it is shown that both the shape and slope of mean discharge rate curves are better predicted by the stochastic model than by the deterministic model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIEEE Trans Biomed Eng
June 1999
Most models of neural response to electrical stimulation, such as the Hodgkin-Huxley equations, are deterministic, despite significant physiological evidence for the existence of stochastic activity. For instance, the range of discharge probabilities measured in response to single electrical pulses cannot be explained at all by deterministic models. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that the stochastic component of auditory nerve response to electrical stimulation may be fundamental to functionally significant physiological and psychophysical phenomena.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl
September 1995