Paediatr Child Health
November 2018
Background: Children are commonly injured on farms, yet no studies provide evidence about exposures that leave rural children visiting farms at risk.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to study (a) how frequently rural nonfarm children are exposed to farms, farm work and associated activities; and (b) the safety conditions and practices on farms being visited.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered in Saskatchewan, Canada to rural parents during 2014.
Background: Children living on farms experience exceptionally high risks for traumatic injury. There is a large body of epidemiological research documenting this phenomenon, yet few complementary studies that have explored the deep underlying reasons for such trends. Fundamental to this is understanding the decision-making processes of parents surrounding their choice to bring children, or not, into the farm worksite.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFollowing publication of the original article [1] the authors notified Production that the names of three authors-Valerie Elliot, Louise Hagel, and Roland Dyck-had been unintentionally omitted in the final online version of the manuscript. The corrected author list is shown in this Correction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To examine sleep patterns in a large cohort of rural children and explore the association between sleep patterns and injury occurrence.
Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of the baseline survey from a prospective cohort study (2012 to 2017) was conducted with 46 rural schools in Saskatchewan, Canada who distributed surveys to parents of 2275 rural dwelling farm and nonfarm children aged 0 to 17 years. Parents reported child sleep characteristics and farm or nonfarm injury in the previous calendar year.
Objectives: Less is known about the respiratory health of general farming and non-framing populations. A longitudinal Saskatchewan Rural Health Study (SRHS) was conducted to explore the association between individual and contextual factors with respiratory health outcomes in these populations. Hence, the objectives are to: (i) describe the updated methodology of longitudinal SRHS-an extension of baseline survey methodology published earlier; (ii) compare baseline characteristics and the prevalences of respiratory health outcomes between drops-outs and completers; and (iii) summarize key findings based on baseline survey data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF