Introduction: Ischaemic heart disease is the single most common cause of death worldwide. Traditionally, distinguishing patients with cardiac ischaemia from patients with less alarming disease, in prehospital triage of chest pain, is challenging for both general practitioners and ambulance paramedics. Less than 20% of patients with chest pain, transferred to the emergency department (ED), have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the transportation and analysis at the ED of non-ACS patients result in substantial healthcare costs and a great patient burden.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should be referred promptly to the hospital to reduce mortality and morbidity. Differentiating between low-risk and high-risk patients remains a diagnostic challenge. Point-of-care testing can contribute to earlier disposition decisions for patients excluded from ACS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays enable more precise use of traditional diagnostic strategies and earlier rule-out/rule-in at 0/1 h or 0/2 h after presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Availability of hs-cTn measurements at point-of-care (POC) can improve timely management of AMI patients. A roadmap for regulatory and analytical validation is exemplified with studies with the Atellica VTLi hs-cTnI at POC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The HEART score is a validated risk stratification tool for chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department and was recently investigated for implementation in a pre-hospital setting. Fingerstick (capillary blood) point-of-care (POC) troponin testing enables quick measurements outside the hospital and seems easier to implement than the current venous blood sampling techniques. This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of the modified HEART score, integrating fingerstick POC troponin testing, in ruling out acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The suturing technique and its associated complications could affect cosmetic outcome after facial surgery. Literature on this topic is limited.
Objective: To compare the cosmetic results 12 months after treatment and complications associated with simple interrupted sutures (SIS) versus running subcuticular sutures (RSS) in facial surgery.