Erectile dysfunction criteria of 131,350 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy.

Purpose: Comparing post-radical prostatectomy erectile function rates among different techniques has always been a challenge in urology. This difficulty is due to the heterogeneity of studies, mainly in relation to the type of erectile function classification criteria used. The aim is to apply a new evidence-gathering methodology, called reverse systematic review, to compare erectile function rates among retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, considering the diversity of classification criteria.

Continence criteria of 193 618 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Objectives: To apply a new evidence-gathering methodology, called reverse systematic review (RSR), to analyse the influence of different continence classification criteria on urinary continence rates among open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted RP (RARP).

Materials And Methods: A search was carried out in eight databases between 2000 and 2020 through systematic reviews (SRs) studies referring to RRP, LRP or RARP (80 SRs). All references used in these SRs were captured referring to 910 papers in an overall database called the 'EVIDENCE Database'.

Radical Prostatectomy Technique Dispute: Analyzing Over 1.35 Million Surgeries in 20 Years of History.

Systematic reviews (SR) produce the best evidence comparing open (RRP), laparoscopic (LRP), and robotic (RARP) radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the hyperfiltration of evidence generates very specific scenarios that reduce the power of extrapolation. To compare RP evidence regarding demographics using a new methodology called reverse systematic review (RSR).

Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Oncological Results: A Reverse Systematic Review.

Systematic reviews (SR) have always been used as the best evidence to compare three radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques: retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), and robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Despite the superiority of minimally invasive surgery in relation to perioperative outcomes, the literature still cannot establish which technique is superior in relation to oncological outcomes. A new methodology called Reverse Systematic Review (RSR) was created to gather the best evidence in the literature based on a heterogeneous sample, allowing the comparison of oncological outcomes from a population point of view.

Taming the Lewis Superacid Al(ORF) (RF=C(CF ) ): DFT Guided Identification of the "Stable yet Reactive" Adduct SiPr →Al(ORF) ; Its Use as ORF- Abstractor from a "Ni-ORF" complex.

A DFT study of several L→Al(OR ) (L=Lewis bases) adducts allowed the identification of ( Pr S)→Al(OR ) 1-S Pr as a "stable yet reactive" adduct. 1-S Pr was shown to act as a masked Lewis superacid able to release Al(OR ) under mild conditions. It could be used to abstract a OR ligand from (bipyMe )Ni(OR ) (bipyMe  : 6,6'-dimethyl-2,2'-dipyridyl) and generate the nickel alkoxide complex [(bipyMe )Ni(OR )( Pr S)] [(R O) Al-F-Al(OR ) ] 5.