Feedback from a workshop by the European Bioanalysis Forum on assay validation requirements for assays following the publication of ICH M12 guideline - a plea for context-of-use over ICH M10 standards.

The release of the ICH M12 Guideline on Drug Interaction Studies has reignited discussions around assay validation requirements for assays such as plasma protein-binding studies. Even though the ICH M12 does not directly reference the ICH M10 Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation and Sample Analysis, its release prompted further discussions on assay validation requirements for these studies during the 17th European Bioanalysis Forum Open Symposium held in Barcelona, Spain, from 19 to 21 November 2024, where we advocated for a Context-of-Use driven approach over rigid adherence to ICH M10 standards. Context-of-Use driven validation ensures assays are tailored to the specific scientific and regulatory needs, optimizing resource allocation and innovation in drug development.

The European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on establishing appropriate drug tolerance levels in antidrug antibody assays.

The European Bioanalysis Forum, in collaboration with several key industry stakeholders, has recently led discussions that address international immunogenicity guidance documents, specifically the three tier approach for immunogenicity testing strategies, after more than 20 years of experience with biotherapeutics. As part of this, the strategy and methods used to assess drug tolerance across all immunogenicity assays are challenged, emphasizing that bioanalytical scientists need to consider the context-of-use of each assay. Here, recommendations for drug tolerance assessments, driven by strong scientific rationale and subject to reevaluation as needed, are provided.

A European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation for requiring a context-of-use statement for successful development and validation of biomarker assays.

The European Bioanalysis Forum, alongside key industry stakeholders, has been driving the discussions around the implementation of context-of use for biomarker assays to ensure that these assays are validated appropriately depending on their purpose. Insights into understanding why the implementation of context-of-use in assay strategies has also shown that the key stakeholder, or requester for the biomarker data, is responsible for providing the context-of-use statement for all biomarker assay requests. Experts from across the industry haves repeatedly sought a cross-industry recommended format in which the context-of-use statement could be provided.

Critical reagent considerations for immunogenicity assay development for bispecific biotherapeutic candidates.

To demonstrate the importance of critical reagent characterization for immunogenicity assay development for multi-specific drugs using two case studies. Bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay with acid-dissociated samples were used for both cases. In the first case study, the unexpected interference in an ADA assay from clinical samples was identified; a model was created to replicate the issue, and an anti-target antibody was identified to mitigate the target interference.

Immunogenicity of avelumab in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma or advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Like other monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be immunogenic in some patients, potentially affecting pharmacokinetics (PKs) and clinical outcomes. In post hoc analyses, we characterized antidrug antibody (ADA) development with avelumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (first-line [1L; N = 116] and second-line or later [≥2L; N = 88] cohorts) or with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 (1L maintenance [N = 350]) and JAVELIN Solid Tumor (≥2L [N = 249]) trials. Treatment-emergent ADAs developed in a numerically higher proportion of patients with aUC (1L maintenance, 19.

Leveraging Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry for Modeling Antibody-Antigen Complexes.

Elucidating antibody-antigen complexes at the atomic level is of utmost interest for understanding immune responses and designing better therapies. Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) has emerged as a powerful tool for mapping protein-protein interactions, suggesting valuable structural insights. However, the use of XL-MS studies to enable epitope/paratope mapping of antibody-antigen complexes is still limited up to now.

Assessing MAPPs assay as a tool to predict the immunogenicity potential of protein therapeutics.

MHC-II-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) is a mass spectrometry-based (MS) method to identify naturally presented MHC-II-associated peptides that could elicit CD4+T cell activation. MAPPs assay is considered one of the assays that better characterize the safety of biotherapeutics by driving the selection of the best candidates concerning their immunogenicity risk. However, there is little knowledge about the impact of bead material on the recovery of MHC-II MS-eluted ligands in MAPPs assays.

Hybrid liquid chromatography high resolution and accuracy mass spectrometry approach for quantification of antibody-drug conjugates at the intact protein level in biological samples.

Preclinical in vivo and in vitro characterization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) involves the development of several bioanalytical methods to address many drug exposure questions. The current pharma industry approach requires at least three different assays that must be run, i.e.

Development of a Liquid Chromatography and High-Resolution and -Accuracy Mass Spectrometry Method to Evaluate New Biotherapeutic Entity Processing in Human Liver Lysosomes.

Biotherapeutic immunogenicity remains a great challenge for researchers because multiple factors trigger immune responses. Predicting and assessing the potential human immune response against biological drugs could represent an impressive breakthrough toward generating potentially safer and more efficacious therapeutic proteins. This article describes an in vitro assay that can contribute to evaluating the potential immunogenicity of biotherapeutics by focusing on lysosomal proteolysis.

Preclinical risk assessment strategy to mitigate the T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein biotherapeutics: State of the art, challenges and future perspectives.

Protein therapeutics hold a prominent role and have brought significant diversity in efficacious medicinal products. Not just monoclonal antibodies and different antibody formats (pegylated antigen-binding fragments, bispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates, single chain variable fragments, nanobodies, dia-, tria- and tetrabodies), but also purified blood products, growth factors, recombinant cytokines, enzyme replacement factors, fusion proteins are all good instances of therapeutic proteins that have been developed in the past decades and approved for their value in oncology, immune-oncology, and autoimmune diseases discovery programs. Although there was an ingrained belief that fully humanized proteins were expected to have limited immunogenicity, adverse effects associated with immune responses to biological therapies raised some concern in biotech companies.

Assay development considerations to improve drug tolerance in direct competitive ligand binding neutralizing antibody assays, pretreatment strategies.

Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) may affect safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a biotherapeutic drug and thus their assessment is of particular importance during immunogenicity testing. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays typically rely on NAbs ability to block the drug-target interaction. Higher NAb concentration and/or higher binding affinity of NAb to the drug, lowers the drug-target binding interaction.

Conference Report from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: toward harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline.

In this report, the European Bioanalysis Forum shares the proposals for harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation and study sample analysis from the ICH M10 workshop. The focus of the discussions was to understand new, changed or still ambiguous regulatory expectations in the guideline, as identified in feedback from the pre-workshop surveys or during the workshop. The proposals from the workshop aim at stimulating and helping a harmonized implementation of the guideline, and using our community as a sounding board during and after implementation to highlight areas of misalignment and to create a platform for continued sharing with the regulatory authorities in an effort to contribute to industry and regulators developing similar interpretations on guideline expectations.

Anti-drug Antibody Sample Testing and Reporting Harmonization.

A clear scientific and operational need exists for harmonized bioanalytical immunogenicity study reporting to facilitate communication of immunogenicity findings and expedient review by industry and health authorities. To address these key bioanalytical reporting gaps and provide a report structure for documenting immunogenicity results, this cross-industry group was formed to establish harmonized recommendations and a develop a submission template to facilitate agency filings. Provided here are recommendations for reporting clinical anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay results using ligand-binding assay technologies.

R399E, A Mutated Form of Growth and Differentiation Factor 5, for Disease Modification of Osteoarthritis.

Objective: To preclinically characterize a mutant form of growth and differentiation factor 5, R399E, with reduced osteogenic properties as a potential disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drug.

Methods: Cartilage, synovium, and meniscus samples from patients with OA were used to evaluate anabolic and antiinflammatory properties of R399E. In the rabbit joint instability model, 65 rabbits underwent transection of the anterior cruciate ligament plus partial meniscectomy.

Biomarker context-of-use: how organizational design can impact the implementation of the appropriate biomarker assay strategy.

Since 2011, the European Bioanalysis Forum has been discussing the topic of context-of-use for biomarker assays, in support of a cross-industry implementation of its principles. The discussions have led to the acknowledgement of the challenges that we face as an industry in implementing these principles. In addition to scientific recommendations, the European Bioanalysis Forum has addressed these challenges by providing recommendations on organizational design, and what works in both sponsor and contract research organizations, to support and enable context-of-use across biomarker strategies.

Recommendations and discussion points on immunogenicity, biomarkers, automation/technology and protein-MS from the 2021 European Bioanalysis Forum Focus Workshops.

During the first half of 2021, and due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic preventing in-person meetings, the European Bioanalysis Forum organized four workshops as live interactive online meetings. The themes discussed at the workshops were carefully selected to match the cyberspace dynamics of the meeting format. The first workshop was a training day on challenges related to immunogenicity.

A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.

Immunogenicity assays are required to evaluate anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses that can be generated against biotherapeutic modalities. Regulatory guidelines focus on clinical requirements, yet it has become apparent that industry has applied these clinical recommendations for immunogenicity assessment to nonclinical studies in varying degrees. ADAs are an anticipated outcome of dosing a humanized or fully human biotherapeutic into an animal.

Update to the European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on biomarkers assays; bringing context of use into practice.

In 2012, the European Bioanalysis Forum published a recommendation on biomarker method development and the bioanalysis of biomarkers in support of drug development. Since then, there has been significant discussion on how to bring the topic of context of use of biomarker assays to the forefront so that the purpose of the assay, the use of the data and the decisions being made with the data are well defined and clearly understood, not just by the bioanalytical scientist, but across all stakeholders. Therefore, it is imperative that discussions between the bioanalytical laboratory and the end users of the data happen early (and regularly) in the drug development process to enable the right assays to be developed and appropriately validated to generate the correct data and allow suitable decisions to be made.

Translational strategies in drug development for knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease worldwide with large unmet medical needs. To bring innovative treatments to OA patients, we at Merck have implemented a comprehensive strategy for drug candidate evaluation. We have a clear framework for decision-making in our preclinical pipeline, to design our clinical proof-of-concept trials for OA patients.

A pharmacology guided approach for setting limits on product-related impurities for bispecific antibody manufacturing.

Introduction: bFKB1 is a humanized bispecific IgG1 antibody, created by conjoining an anti-Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1) half-antibody to an anti-Klothoβ (KLB) half-antibody, using the knobs-into-holes strategy. bFKB1 acts as a highly selective agonist for the FGFR1/KLB receptor complex and is intended to ameliorate obesity-associated metabolic defects by mimicking the activity of the hormone FGF21. An important aspect of the biologics product manufacturing process is to establish meaningful product specifications regarding the tolerable levels of impurities that copurify with the drug product.