Learning not to attend to distractors if the task is demanding: Constraints on the attentional white bear effect.

Four experiments investigated the attentional white bear (AWB) effect, in which attention increases for an upcoming distractor, and identified two key factors that interact to determine when it occurs: learned attentional set and top-down attentional control. Participants do not show enhanced attention if they begin the experiment with trials that include distractors; the effect only appears in participants who start with a block of trials without distractors. The presence or absence of distractors induces participants to adopt an attentional set that they then maintain when the distractor condition changes.

What gaze direction can tell us about cognitive processes in invertebrates.

Most visually guided animals shift their gaze using body movements, eye movements, or both to gather information selectively from their environments. Psychological studies of eye movements have advanced our understanding of perceptual and cognitive processes that mediate visual attention in humans and other vertebrates. However, much less is known about how these processes operate in other organisms, particularly invertebrates.

Both feature comparisons and location comparisons are subject to bias.

Four experiments explore the generalizability of two different types of bias in visual comparison. The first type is a spatial congruency bias, in which two target stimuli are more likely to be classified as matching ('same') if they appear successively at the same location. The second type is an analytic bias, which varies depending on the overall similarity of the displays and the need to select specific parts from each object.

Experience with searching in displays containing depth improves search performance by training participants to search more exhaustively.

In a typical visual search task, participants search for single targets amongst displays containing non-overlapping objects that are presented on a single depth plane. Recent work has begun to examine displays containing overlapping objects that are presented on different depth planes to one another. It has been found that searching displays containing depth improves response accuracy by making participants more likely to fixate targets and to identify targets after fixating them.

A region complexity effect masquerading as object-based attention.

A large portion of the evidence for object-based attention comes from experiments using the two-rectangle paradigm introduced by Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994), in which response times are longer when the two stimulus locations relevant to the task are on separate objects. In the new experiments presented here, response times are longer when the two locations are part of the same object but are separated by a concavity in the object, so that the region directly between the two locations is crossed by the object's boundaries. Response times when the two locations are separated by the concavity are not statistically different from when they are on two separate objects.

Location-Specific Orientation Set Is Independent of the Horizontal Benefit with or Without Object Boundaries.

Chen and Cave (2019) showed that facilitation in visual comparison tasks that had previously been attributed to object-based attention could more directly be explained as facilitation in comparing two shapes that are configured horizontally rather than vertically. They also cued the orientation of the upcoming stimulus configuration without cuing its location and found an asymmetry: the orientation cue only enhanced performance for vertical configurations. The current study replicates the horizontal benefit in visual comparison and again demonstrates that it is independent of surrounding object boundaries.

Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.

There has been an increasing drive to understand failures in searches for weapons and explosives in X-ray baggage screening. Tracking eye movements during the search has produced new insights into the guidance of attention during the search, and the identification of targets once they are fixated. Here, we review the eye-movement literature that has emerged on this front over the last fifteen years, including a discussion of the problems that real-world searchers face when trying to detect targets that could do serious harm to people and infrastructure.

When is object-based attention not based on objects?

Some studies using methods introduced by Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994) to measure object-based attention have shown surprising effects of object orientation. Rectangles oriented horizontally produce evidence for object-based attention, whereas vertical rectangles do not. We explore these differences using a two-letter comparison task.

The relationship between working memory and the dual-target cost in visual search guidance.

Searching for two targets produces a dual-target cost compared with single-target search, with reduced attentional guidance toward targets (Stroud, Menneer, Cave, & Donnelly, 2012). We explore the effect of holding a color in working memory (WM) on guidance in single-target search. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants searched for a T of a specific color while holding one of the following in WM: a color patch, a letter, a dot pattern, or an oriented bar.

We can guide search by a set of colors, but are reluctant to do it.

For some real-world color searches, the target colors are not precisely known, and any item within a range of color values should be attended. Thus, a target representation that captures multiple similar colors would be advantageous. If such a multicolor search is possible, then search for two targets (e.

Eye movements are an important part of the story, but not the whole story.

Some previous accounts of visual search have emphasized covert attention at the expense of eye movements, and others have focused on eye movements while ignoring covert attention. Both selection mechanisms are likely to contribute to many searches, and a full account of search will probably need to explain how the two interact to find visual targets.

Dual Target Search is Neither Purely Simultaneous nor Purely Successive.

Previous research shows that visual search for two different targets is less efficient than search for a single target. Stroud, Menneer, Cave and Donnelly (2012) concluded that two target colours are represented separately based on modeling the fixation patterns. Although those analyses provide evidence for two separate target representations, they do not show whether participants search simultaneously for both targets, or first search for one target and then the other.

Two kinds of bias in visual comparison illustrate the role of location and holistic/analytic processing differences.

A number of studies have shown that two stimuli appearing successively at the same spatial location are more likely to be perceived as the same, even though location is irrelevant to the task. This bias to respond "same" when stimuli are at the same location is termed spatial congruency bias. The experiments reported here demonstrate that the spatial congruency bias extends to letter strings: Participants tend to respond "same" when comparing two strings appearing successively at the same location.

Adding depth to overlapping displays can improve visual search performance.

Standard models of visual search have focused upon asking participants to search for a single target in displays where the objects do not overlap one another, and where the objects are presented on a single depth plane. This stands in contrast to many everyday visual searches wherein variations in overlap and depth are the norm, rather than the exception. Here, we addressed whether presenting overlapping objects on different depths planes to one another can improve search performance.

Dual-target cost in visual search for multiple unfamiliar faces.

The efficiency of visual search for one (single-target) and either of two (dual-target) unfamiliar faces was explored to understand the manifestations of capacity and guidance limitations in face search. The visual similarity of distractor faces to target faces was manipulated using morphing (Experiments 1 and 2) and multidimensional scaling (Experiment 3). A dual-target cost was found in all experiments, evidenced by slower and less accurate search in dual- than single-target conditions.

Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom.

Visual selection is imperfect; whenever a complex array of objects is processed, representations of multiple objects are likely to be active simultaneously. A full account of attentional processing must explain how these representations affect one another and how they interact to produce a response. Evidence on these interactions comes from measures of distractor interference and from dilution of distractor effects by other nontargets.

Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.

Perceptual load theory (Lavie, 2005) claims that attentional capacity that is not used for the current task is allocated to irrelevant distractors. It predicts that if the attentional demands of the current task are high, distractor interference will be low. One particularly powerful demonstration of perceptual load effects on distractor processing relies on a go/no-go cue that is interpreted by either simple feature detection or feature conjunction (Lavie, 1995).

Understanding the contribution of target repetition and target expectation to the emergence of the prevalence effect in visual search.

Behavior in visual search tasks is influenced by the proportion of trials on which a target is presented (the target prevalence). Previous research has shown that when target prevalence is low (2 % prevalence), participants tend to miss targets, as compared with higher prevalence levels (e.g.

Singleton search is guided by knowledge of the target, but maybe it shouldn't be.

Among studies of visual search for a singleton, some studies show evidence of top-down attentional guidance driven by goals, while others do not, leading to uncertainty as to how goal-driven guidance should be included in attentional theories. Six experiments tested this guidance when a target shape is found by locating a singleton feature (color or shape) and an orientation within the target is then reported. Experiments 1 and 2 use the dimensional priming paradigm underlying the most effective arguments against goal-driven guidance, and show evidence for guidance in many circumstances.

Perceptual failures in the selection and identification of low-prevalence targets in relative prevalence visual search.

Previous research has shown that during visual search tasks target prevalence (the proportion of trials in which a target appears) influences both the probability that a target will be detected, and the speed at which participants will quit searching and provide an 'absent' response. When prevalence is low (e.g.

The effects of increasing target prevalence on information processing during visual search.

The proportion of trials on which a target is presented (referred to as the target prevalence) during visual search influences the probability that the target will be detected. As prevalence increases, participants become biased toward reporting that the target is present. This bias results in an increase in detection rates for the target, coupled with an increased likelihood of making a false alarm.

Constraints on dilution from a narrow attentional zoom reveal how spatial and color cues direct selection.

Distractor interference is subject to dilution from other nontarget elements, and the level of dilution is affected by attention. This study explores the nature of dilution when the location and color of the target is known in advance. Experiments 1 and 2 show that attention is effectively limited to the precued region, so that it is the nontarget letters appearing at the cued locations that are responsible for most of the dilution, and not those appearing at the uncued locations.

Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.

Many studies have shown that increasing the number of neutral stimuli in a display decreases distractor interference. This result has been interpreted within two different frameworks; a perceptual load account, based on a reduction in spare resources, and a dilution account, based on a degradation in distractor representation and/or an increase in crosstalk between the distractor and the neutral stimuli that contain visually similar features. In four experiments, we systematically manipulated the extent of attentional focus, stimulus category, and preknowledge of the target to examine how these factors would interact with the display set size to influence the degree of distractor processing.

Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items.

Searching simultaneously for metal threats (guns and knives) and improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in X-ray images is less effective than 2 independent single-target searches, 1 for metal threats and 1 for IEDs. The goals of this study were to (a) replicate this dual-target cost for categorical targets and to determine whether the cost remains when X-ray images overlap, (b) determine the role of attentional guidance in this dual-target cost by measuring eye movements, and (c) determine the effect of practice on guidance. Untrained participants conducted 5,376 trials of visual search of X-ray images, each specializing in single-target search for metal threats, single-target search for IEDs, or dual-target search for both.