Publications by authors named "KuoHsin Chen"
Background: Anatomical liver resection is the gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), enhancing survival and disease-free outcomes. For centrally located tumors, major resections are necessary but risky, especially for patients with liver disease. Central hepatectomy (CH) offers a parenchymal-sparing alternative to extended or hemihepatectomy (HH), reducing postoperative liver failure risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- A study was conducted to compare robotic minor liver resections (RMLR) with laparoscopic minor liver resections (LMLR) in patients undergoing surgery on the anterolateral liver segments.
- The analysis included over 10,000 patients and employed propensity score matching to balance the groups for accuracy in comparisons.
- Results indicated RMLR had benefits like less blood loss, lower major morbidity, and shorter hospital stays than LMLR, although the difference in 30-day readmission rates suggested RMLR may have some drawbacks.
Background: Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common surgical procedure worldwide. Although IHR can be performed by the minimally invasive method, which accelerates recovery, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) remains a common complication that significantly impacts patients. Thus, it is essential to identify the risk factors associated with POUR to diminish its negative impact.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- The study aimed to create global benchmark outcome indicators for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies (L-RPS/H67) to improve surgical standards.
- It analyzed data from 854 patients across 57 centers globally, establishing key performance benchmarks for low-risk cases based on specific outcome indicators.
- The findings set standard benchmarks for metrics like operation time and complication rates, serving as a reference for surgical auditing and improvement.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates the risk factors and outcomes related to open conversion during minimally invasive liver resections (MILR), especially in minor hepatectomies, highlighting its association with inferior results.
- Analysis was conducted on data from over 10,500 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic liver resections from 2004 to 2020, identifying key independent predictors for open conversion.
- Results show that patients who required open conversion experienced longer recovery times, increased blood loss, higher complications, and elevated 90-day mortality rates compared to those who had successful minimally invasive surgeries.
Article Synopsis
- This study assessed how liver cirrhosis (LC) influences the challenges of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR), specifically for minor surgeries involving primary liver tumors in anterolateral segments.
- Conducted from 2004 to 2021 across 60 centers, the research involved 3,675 patients, with varying degrees of cirrhosis classified as Child A and Child B.
- Results indicated that patients with Child A cirrhosis faced higher risks of complications, such as increased blood loss and rates of open conversion, while those with Child B cirrhosis had longer hospital stays and more significant morbidity; overall, the severity of LC complicates the surgical process, highlighting the need for better difficulty
Article Synopsis
- Minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) can reduce blood loss and recovery time compared to traditional methods, but the impact of cirrhosis on these procedures is not fully understood.
- A study reviewed data from 2534 patients who underwent minimally invasive major liver surgeries worldwide, focusing on outcomes related to different levels of cirrhosis.
- Results showed that advanced cirrhosis leads to higher blood transfusion rates, more postoperative complications, and longer hospital stays, suggesting that cirrhosis severity should be considered in future assessments of surgical difficulty in MILR.*
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PHT) affect the complexity and outcomes of minimally invasive liver surgery in specific liver segments.
- It examines a large patient group, revealing that those with cirrhosis experienced more complications and required more blood transfusions during surgery.
- The findings suggest that the presence of cirrhosis and PHT should be considered when evaluating the difficulties and risks associated with minimally invasive liver resections.
Article Synopsis
- Tumor size (TS) impacts intraoperative outcomes in laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH), with this study aiming to clarify its effects and find optimal TS cutoffs for assessing surgical difficulty.
- The analysis, which included 1396 patients from a larger pool of 3008 undergoing L-MH, identified two critical TS cutoffs at 50 mm and 100 mm that segmented patients into three distinct groups.
- Results showed that larger TS correlated with increased open conversion rates, longer operation times, higher blood loss, and more intraoperative blood transfusions, while postoperative complications remained similar across the groups.
Article Synopsis
- This study aimed to compare outcomes of robotic limited liver resections (RLLR) and laparoscopic limited liver resections (LLLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver segments, noting that previous research had not thoroughly examined the differences in performance and safety between the two approaches.
- An analysis of data from 3510 patients showed that RLLR had significant advantages over LLLR, including a lower rate of open conversions, reduced blood loss, and shorter operative times, even in patients with cirrhosis.
- Despite the improved perioperative outcomes for RLLR, postoperative metrics like readmission, morbidity, and mortality rates were similar between both surgical techniques.
Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a very aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. As surgery is the only curative therapy, preoperative evaluation of the tumor extent is essential for surgical planning. Although high-quality image modalities such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have been used extensively in preoperative evaluation, the accuracy is low.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The impact of cirrhosis and portal hypertension on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies remains unclear. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between patients with preserved and compromised liver function (noncirrhotics versus Child-Pugh A) when undergoing minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies. In addition, we aimed to determine if the extent of cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A versus B) and the presence of portal hypertension had a significant impact on perioperative outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Data on the effect of body mass index on laparoscopic liver resections are conflicting. We performed this study to investigate the association between body mass index and postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic major hepatectomies.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of 4,348 laparoscopic major hepatectomies at 58 centers between 2005 and 2021, of which 3,383 met the study inclusion criteria.
Article Synopsis
- - The study investigates how body mass index (BMI) affects outcomes after laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS), revealing that higher BMI levels (greater than 27kg/m²) lead to increased blood loss, longer operative times, and more open conversions during surgery.
- - A large sample of 2,183 patients from 59 centers worldwide was analyzed, showing that as BMI increases, so do certain negative surgical outcomes, but patient complications also exhibited a "U" shaped relationship—higher rates were seen in both underweight and obese individuals.
- - The findings suggest that BMI should be considered in evaluating the difficulty of L-LLS procedures and in future assessments of surgical risk and outcomes.
Article Synopsis
- Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and robotic liver resections (RLR) are effective techniques for treating large liver tumors (≥10 cm), and a multicenter study provides better understanding of their safety and application.
- A retrospective review of 971 patients from 42 centers between 2002-2020 revealed that 100 underwent RLR and 699 underwent LLR, with a focus on comparing perioperative outcomes.
- After matching for patient characteristics, the study found no significant differences in key outcomes between RLR and LLR, indicating both methods can be safely used with excellent results for large tumors.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to compare outcomes of robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH), exploring whether R-MH offers any advantages.
- An analysis of 4822 patient cases across 59 centers revealed that R-MH resulted in significantly less blood loss, fewer applications of the Pringle maneuver, and lower rates of conversion to open surgery.
- Moreover, R-MH showed reduced postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stays for patients with cirrhosis compared to L-MH, indicating its potential benefits.
Background: The aim of this multicentric study was to investigate the impact of tumor location and size on the difficulty of Laparoscopic-Left Hepatectomy (L-LH).
Methods: Patients who underwent L-LH performed across 46 centers from 2004 to 2020 were analyzed. Of 1236 L-LH, 770 patients met the study criteria.