Ocriplasmin treatment for vitreomacular traction in real life: can the indication spectrum be expanded?

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ocriplasmin for the resolution of vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without a full thickness macular hole (FTMH) in the clinical setting and to assess whether the indication spectrum of this treatment modality can be expanded beyond that of the MIVI-TRUST trials.

Methods: The records of patients with VMT with or without FTMH, who were treated with intravitreal ocriplasmin were reviewed. Patients were divided in two groups.

Outcome of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of ranibizumab-resistant macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

To assess the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) resistant to repeated intravitreal ranibizumab injection. Retrospective review of 11 patients (11 eyes) with ranibizumab-resistant macular edema secondary to RVO. Macular edema was considered refractory to ranibizumab if no change of the pattern of macular fluid on optical coherence tomography and no change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was observed after at least three consecutive monthly injections, excluding the loading dose.

20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane.

To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of 20 gauge (g) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G (BBG)-assisted ILM peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). 38 eyes of 38 patients with idiopathic ERM were included. They were divided in two groups: group 1 (18 eyes) underwent 20 g PPV with ICG-assisted ILM peeling and group 2 (20 eyes) 23 g PPV with BBG-assisted ILM peeling.

Two week, OCT-based follow-up as guidance for retreatment with ranibizumab for CNV apparently refractory to therapy.

Purpose: To assess the value of 2-week optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up for re-treatment decision-making in patients receiving monthly ranibizumab injections for choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV), which was apparently refractory to treatment.

Methods: A total of 25 eyes of 25 consecutive patients with refractory CNV were included. Patients were classified as having refractory disease if no visual acuity (VA) change and no change in the pattern of macular fluid was noticed on OCT after at least 3 consecutive monthly injections, excluding the loading doses.

Individualizing treatment and choice of medication in lichen planus: a step by step approach.

Although lichen planus is one of the most common dermatological entities, very few reviews on its management exist in the literature. Standard therapeutic approaches include various topical treatments (including topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs) and phototherapy modalities, as well as systemic corticosteroids and systemic retinoids. While localized skin lesions are easily managed with standard modalities, generalized forms and in particular involvement of hair follicles, nails and mucosa, as well as eyes are often challenging.

Information used to decide on retreatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with anti-VEGF in clinical practice.

Purpose. To record the information used in order to make a retreatment decision in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to assess if an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-only follow-up clinic would suffice.
Methods.

Macular ischaemia: a contraindication for anti-VEGF treatment in retinal vascular disease?

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been shown to be effective at improving vision in patients with macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy and vein occlusions, but blocking VEGF at least in theory could be detrimental to vascular integrity. For this reason, some patients with macular ischaemia were excluded from studies showing the effectiveness of therapy. A considerable number of patients present with mixed pathology of macular oedema and macular ischaemia and it is often impossible to determine the degree to which ischaemia accounts for decreased vision.