Background: Because more botulinum toxin (BoNT) preparations have become available worldwide, there is a clinical need to compare the pharmacologic profiles of these products.
Objective: We compared three different preparations: onabotulinumtoxinA (ona-BoNT/A), abobotulinumtoxinA (abo-BoNT/A), and Neuronox (neu-BoNT/A), in a mouse model using a digit abduction scoring (DAS) assay.
Methods: The efficacy, duration of effect, and safety margin of each preparation was determined after delivering a single injection to the right gastrocnemius (0-240 U/kg body weight of neu-BoNT/A or ona-BoNT/A; 0-600 Speywood Units/kg body weight of abo-BoNT/A).