ACES: A new framework for the application of the 2018 periodontal status classification scheme to epidemiological survey data.

Aim: To propose a framework for consistently applying the 2018 periodontal status classification scheme to epidemiological surveys (Application of the 2018 periodontal status Classification to Epidemiological Survey data, ACES).

Proposed Framework: We specified data requirements and workflows for either completed or planned epidemiological surveys, utilizing commonly collected measures of periodontal status (clinical attachment levels [CAL], probing depths, bleeding on probing), as well as additional necessary variables for the implementation of the 2018 periodontal status classification (tooth loss due to periodontitis and complexity factors). Following detailed instructions and flowcharts, survey participants are classified as having periodontal health, gingivitis or periodontitis.

Diagnostic reproducibility of the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype: A multicenter inter- and intra-examiner agreement study.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-examiner agreement among international experts on the diagnosis of gingival recession defects using the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype as proposed in the 2017 World Workshop.

Methods: Standardized intraoral photographs from 28 gingival recession defects were evaluated twice by 16 expert periodontists. Recession type (RT), recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness (GT), detectability of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and presence of root steps (RS) were recorded and used for the analysis.

Agreement among international periodontal experts using the 2017 World Workshop classification of periodontitis.

Background: A new periodontitis classification was recently introduced involving multidimensional staging and grading. The aim of the study was to assess if individuals well-trained in periodontics consistently used the new classification for patients with severe periodontitis. The secondary goal was to identify "gray zones" related to classifications.

Machine learning-assisted immune profiling stratifies peri-implantitis patients with unique microbial colonization and clinical outcomes.

The endemic of peri-implantitis affects over 25% of dental implants. Current treatment depends on empirical patient and site-based stratifications and lacks a consistent risk grading system. We investigated a unique cohort of peri-implantitis patients undergoing regenerative therapy with comprehensive clinical, immune, and microbial profiling.

Diagnosis of Stage III Periodontitis and Ambiguities of the "Gray Zones" in Between Stage III and Stage IV.

Introduction: How to best classify the Stage III and IV periodontitis cases that share common features of the most severe clinical attachment loss and the most severe radiographic bone loss?

Case Presentation: Two patients presented features of generalized periodontitis, with severe probing depth and clinical attachment loss that would meet inclusion in both Stage III and IV. The cases retained all teeth but were further complicated by teeth drifting and secondary occlusal trauma. Appropriate disease classification required clinical judgement and led to the final classification of Stage III, Grade C for both cases.

Using business intelligence and data visualization to understand the characteristics of failed appointments in dental school clinics.

Purpose/objectives: Broken appointments are an important cause of waste in health care. Patients who fail to attend incur costs to providers, deny trainees learning opportunities, and impact their own health as well as that of other patients who are waiting for care.

Methods: A total of 410,000 appointment records over 3 years were extracted from our electronic health record.

Staging and Grading Discussion of Borderline Cases in Gray Zones.

Introduction: Staging and grading for chronic periodontal disease, as described in 2018, is designed to focus on key distinctions with the recognition that there is a subset of individuals who are on a different clinical trajectory of disease. The staging and grading framework aids the clinician in generating a periodontal diagnosis, however, some cases fall into gray zones in which the simple diagnostic parameters make it challenging to categorize the patient. These cases do not present with clear clinical findings and medical and dental histories that fit within the simple guidelines defined in the staging and grading tables and subsequent algorithms.

Challenges and Decision Making for the Classification of Two Complex Periodontal Cases.

Focused Clinical Question: What are the fundamental debates and questions related to the newly developed two-vector system for classification of periodontal diseases that have emerged as to how to accurately assign, stage, and grade periodontitis cases? The aim of the present manuscript is to demonstrate the essential thought processes that are needed in utilizing the new periodontitis classification system to diagnose two gray zone cases.

Summary: Clinical case 1 includes an 83-year-old male diagnosed with periodontitis and classified as Stage III Generalized Grade B periodontitis, while clinical case 2, a 73-year-old male was classified as presenting Stage IV Generalized Grade B periodontitis. Although clinical and radiographic evaluations revealed similarities between the cases, the thought process that includes clinical judgment is described to guide a more accurate diagnosis following the guidelines of the new classification system.

Future of preventing and managing common chronic inflammatory diseases.

Chronic inflammation has emerged as a key factor that contributes to some common chronic diseases and reduces lifespan. Studies have identified multiple types of chronic inflammation ranging from autoimmune disease, which attacks specific tissues, to autoinflammatory diseases, which cause low-grade systemic inflammation and contribute to several common chronic diseases. This article highlights new perspectives on the role of chronic inflammation in cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Guest Editorial: Clarifications on the use of the new classification of periodontitis.

This editorial provides clarifications on the application of the Stage and Grade classification of periodontitis. In particular it describes: (1) how to apply the extent criterion to the defined Stage of the disease; and (2) how to calculate tooth loss because of periodontitis in Stage III and IV cases presenting with evidently hopeless (irrational to treat) teeth with a clinical definition of such teeth.

Clinical application of the new classification of periodontal diseases: Ground rules, clarifications and "gray zones".

Background: Successful dissemination of the new classification of periodontitis is facilitated by emphasis on the basic ground rules, clarification of ambiguities, and identification of "gray zones" where thoughtful application of the guidelines by an informed, experienced clinician is paramount to arrive at a correct Stage and Grade.

Methods: Highlighted ground rules are (1) Stage is a patient-based, not a tooth-based concept, therefore, a single Stage is assigned per patient; (2) Stage can shift upward over time, if the periodontal status deteriorates, but the initially assigned Stage is retained even after improvement post-therapy; (3) the complexity factors that determine Stage must be evaluated collectively, not in isolation, to arrive at a clinically meaningful assessment; (4) a single Grade is assigned to a patient based on a deliberate evaluation of the "biological fabric" of the case, in terms of history of/risk for further progression, interplay of risk factors, and the two-way effects of periodontitis or its treatment on general health; (v) shift of Grade over time is possible towards either direction, after thorough, collective, evaluation of changes in the above parameters. Exemplified gray zones include a radiographically intact patient with minimal attachment loss in older age; presence of "frank" periodontitis affecting a single tooth; and assessment of factors that do/do not lead to increased complexity of therapy.

Using periodontal staging and grading system as a prognostic factor for future tooth loss: A long-term retrospective study.

Background: A new classification of periodontal diseases aimed to identify periodontal disease based on a multidimensional staging and grading system has been recently proposed. However, up to date, its prognostic predictive capability has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess if parameters included in the new classification were predictive of tooth loss after a long-term follow-up (>10 years) in patients with periodontitis.

Biologically guided implant therapy: A diagnostic and therapeutic strategy of conservation and preservation based on periodontal staging and grading.

Biologically guided implant therapy is based on the new periodontitis classification system recently released by the American Academy of Periodontology and the European Federation of Periodontology that uses staging and grading for the diagnosis of periodontitis. This paper proposes that periodontitis staging and grading should be used in dental implant therapy as a means to ensure maximum conservation of teeth and maximum preservation of alveolar bone. These biologic principles should guide the treatment planning process and supersede a mechanically based, restoratively driven rationale that should be secondary to the biologic principles of conservation and preservation but part of the collaborative treatment planning process.

Contemporary approaches for identifying individual risk for periodontitis.

Key breakthroughs in our understanding of the etiology and principles of predictable treatment of patients with chronic periodontitis first emerged in the late 1960s and carried on into the mid-1980s. Unfortunately, some generalizations of the evidence led many to believe that periodontitis was a predictable result of exposure to bacterial plaque accumulations over time. For a brief period, the initial plaque concept was translated by some to implicate specific bacterial infections, with both concepts (plaque exposure and specific infection) being false assumptions that led to clinical outcomes which were frustrating to both the clinician and the patient.

Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition.

Background: Authors were assigned the task to develop case definitions for periodontitis in the context of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. The aim of this manuscript is to review evidence and rationale for a revision of the current classification, to provide a framework for case definition that fully implicates state-of-the-art knowledge and can be adapted as new evidence emerges, and to suggest a case definition system that can be implemented in clinical practice, research and epidemiologic surveillance.

Methods: Evidence gathered in four commissioned reviews was analyzed and interpreted with special emphasis to changes with regards to the understanding available prior to the 1999 classification.

Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.

A new periodontitis classification scheme has been adopted, in which forms of the disease previously recognized as "chronic" or "aggressive" are now grouped under a single category ("periodontitis") and are further characterized based on a multi-dimensional staging and grading system. Staging is largely dependent upon the severity of disease at presentation as well as on the complexity of disease management, while grading provides supplemental information about biological features of the disease including a history-based analysis of the rate of periodontitis progression; assessment of the risk for further progression; analysis of possible poor outcomes of treatment; and assessment of the risk that the disease or its treatment may negatively affect the general health of the patient. Necrotizing periodontal diseases, whose characteristic clinical phenotype includes typical features (papilla necrosis, bleeding, and pain) and are associated with host immune response impairments, remain a distinct periodontitis category.

Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition.

Background: Authors were assigned the task to develop case definitions for periodontitis in the context of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. The aim of this manuscript is to review evidence and rationale for a revision of the current classification, to provide a framework for case definition that fully implicates state-of-the-art knowledge and can be adapted as new evidence emerges, and to suggest a case definition system that can be implemented in clinical practice, research and epidemiologic surveillance.

Methods: Evidence gathered in four commissioned reviews was analyzed and interpreted with special emphasis to changes with regards to the understanding available prior to the 1999 classification.

Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.

A new periodontitis classification scheme has been adopted, in which forms of the disease previously recognized as "chronic" or "aggressive" are now grouped under a single category ("periodontitis") and are further characterized based on a multi-dimensional staging and grading system. Staging is largely dependent upon the severity of disease at presentation as well as on the complexity of disease management, while grading provides supplemental information about biological features of the disease including a history-based analysis of the rate of periodontitis progression; assessment of the risk for further progression; analysis of possible poor outcomes of treatment; and assessment of the risk that the disease or its treatment may negatively affect the general health of the patient. Necrotizing periodontal diseases, whose characteristic clinical phenotype includes typical features (papilla necrosis, bleeding, and pain) and are associated with host immune response impairments, remain a distinct periodontitis category.

Interleukin-1 genotypes modulate the long-term effect of lipoprotein(a) on cardiovascular events: The Ioannina Study.

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetic risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), and proinflammatory interleukin-1 (IL-1) genotypes may influence Lp(a)-mediated CVD events. The genotype IL-1(+) is associated with higher rates of inflammation than IL-1(-) genotype. Targeting IL-1β was recently shown to decrease CVD events independent of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels.

Quo vadis: what is the future of periodontics? How will we get there?

Approximately 40 years ago periodontists began systematically developing the evidence to treat predictably and prevent gingivitis and periodontitis. More recently, periodontists have been among a small group of skilled dental-implant surgeons leading that revolution in dentistry. Today, much of the mild/localized moderate periodontitis is not treated by periodontists, and an increasing number of implants are placed by dentists with limited surgical training.

Influence of Obesity on Periodontitis Progression Is Conditional on Interleukin-1 Inflammatory Genetic Variation.

Background: This study evaluates whether specific patterns of interleukin (IL)-1 gene variants, known to affect periodontitis severity, influence the previously reported association between obesity and subsequent periodontitis progression in a longitudinal database. The study population included 292 men (aged 29 to 64 years at entry) from the Veterans Affairs Dental Longitudinal Study from whom DNA and dental and anthropometric endpoints were collected during multiple examinations (approximately every 3 years for up to 27 years).

Methods: Key variables assessed included: 1) periodontitis; 2) body mass index; 3) waist circumference to height (WHTR) ratio for central adiposity; 4) age; 5) smoking; 6) glucose tolerance; and 7) two previously reported versions of IL-1 genetic patterns associated with periodontitis severity and progression.