The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the PROPELLER MRI technology from four different vendors in handling head movements during scans.
Images were taken from a brain-simulating phantom using devices from Canon, GE, Philips, and Siemens, and evaluated for sensitivity to different types of head motion.
Results showed that while Canon performed well with small movements, GE's use of deep learning improved image correction, Philips varied in effectiveness, and Siemens was effective against larger movements, indicating the technology’s potential for clinical use despite patient movement.