Sensorimotor learning can change the tuning of neurons in motor-related brain areas and rotate their preferred directions (PDs). These PD rotations are commonly interpreted as reflecting motor command changes; however, cortical neurons that display PD rotations also contribute to sensorimotor learning. Sensorimotor learning should, therefore, alter not only motor commands but also the tuning of neurons responsible for this learning, and thus impact subsequent learning ability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study investigates the muscle modules involved in the increase of walking speed in radiographical and asymptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients using tensor decomposition. The human body possesses redundancy, which is the property to achieve desired movements with more degrees of freedom than necessary. The muscle module hypothesis is a proposed solution to this redundancy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVariability is one of the most crucial outcomes in human movement studies: variance and standard deviation of various parameters have been reported in numerous studies. However, in many of these studies, the numbers of trials and subjects have been intuitively determined and not justified with statistical considerations. Here, we investigated the impact of the numbers of trials and subjects on statistical power, based on the assumption that results per trial follow a normal distribution, using mathematical analysis and numerical simulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Sports Act Living
January 2024
How to achieve stable locomotion while overcoming various instabilities is an ongoing research topic. One essential factor for achieving a stable gait is controlling the center of body mass (CoM). The CoM yields more instability in the mediolateral direction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHow does the central nervous system (CNS) control our bodies, including hundreds of degrees of freedom (DoFs)? A hypothesis to reduce the number of DoFs posits that the CNS controls groups of joints or muscles (i.e., modules) rather than each joint or muscle independently.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLearning accurate and fast movements typically accompanies the modulation of feedforward control. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how motor skill learning modulates feedforward control, such as through maladaptation of the sensorimotor system by extensive training (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Sports Act Living
July 2022
Why do professional athletes and musicians exhibit individually different motion patterns? For example, baseball pitchers generate various pitching forms, e.g., variable wind-up, cocking, and follow-through forms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHow do skilled players change their motion patterns depending on motion effort? Pitchers commonly accelerate wrist and elbow joint rotations via proximal joint motions. Contrastingly, they show individually different pitching motions, such as in wind-up or follow-through. Despite the generality of the uniform and diverse features, effort-dependent effects on these features are unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Sports Act Living
February 2021
Humans tend to select motor planning with a high reward and low success compared with motor planning, which has a small reward and high success rate. Previous studies have shown such a risk-seeking property in motor decision tasks. However, it is unclear how to facilitate a shift from risk-seeking to optimal motor planning that maximizes the expected reward.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe central nervous system (CNS) achieves a stable gait at several speeds and modes while controlling diverse instability. An essential feature of a gait is the motion of the center of body mass (CoM). CoM motion is at larger risk for trespassing the base of support in the mediolateral direction than in the anteroposterior direction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenerating appropriate motor commands is an essential brain function. To achieve proper motor control in diverse situations, predicting future states of the environment and body and modifying the prediction are indispensable. The internal model is a promising hypothesis about brain function for generating and modifying the prediction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDecomposition of motion data into task-relevant and task-irrelevant components is an effective way to clarify the diverse features involved in motor control and learning. Several previous methods have succeeded in this type of decomposition while focusing on the clear relation of motion to both a specific goal and a continuous outcome, such as a 10 mm deviation from a target or 1 m/s hand velocity. In daily life, it is vital to quantify not only continuous but also categorical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlthough optimal decision-making is essential for sports performance and fine motor control, it has been repeatedly confirmed that humans show a strong risk-seeking bias, selecting a risky strategy over an optimal solution. Despite such evidence, the ideal method to promote optimal decision-making remains unclear. Here, we propose that interactions with other people can influence motor decision-making and improve risk-seeking bias.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHow the central nervous system (CNS) controls many joints and muscles is a fundamental question in motor neuroscience and related research areas. An attractive hypothesis is the module hypothesis: the CNS controls groups of joints or muscles (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMotor variability is inevitable in human body movements and has been addressed from various perspectives in motor neuroscience and biomechanics: it may originate from variability in neural activities, or it may reflect a large number of degrees of freedom inherent in our body movements. How to evaluate motor variability is thus a fundamental question. Previous methods have quantified (at least) two striking features of motor variability: smaller variability in the task-relevant dimension than in the task-irrelevant dimension and a low-dimensional structure often referred to as synergy or principal components.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHumans and animals can flexibly switch rules to generate the appropriate response to the same sensory stimulus, e.g., we kick a soccer ball toward a friend on our team, but we kick the ball away from a friend who is traded to an opposing team.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGoal-directed whole-body movements are fundamental in our daily life, sports, music, art, and other activities. Goal-directed movements have been intensively investigated by focusing on simplified movements (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDespite a near-infinite number of possible movement trajectories, our body movements exhibit certain invariant features across individuals; for example, when grasping a cup, individuals choose an approximately linear path from the hand to the cup. Based on these experimental findings, many researchers have proposed optimization frameworks to determine desired movement trajectories. Successful conventional frameworks include the geodesic path, which considers the geometry of our complicated body dynamics, and stochastic frameworks, which consider movement variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCertain theoretical frameworks have successfully explained motor learning in either unimanual or bimanual movements. However, no single theoretical framework can comprehensively explain motor learning in both types of movement because the relationship between these two types of movement remains unclear. Although our recent model of a balanced motor primitive framework attempted to simultaneously explain motor learning in unimanual and bimanual movements, this model focused only on a limited subset of bimanual movements and therefore did not elucidate the relationships between unimanual movements and various bimanual movements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMost motor learning experiments have been conducted in a laboratory setting. In this type of setting, a huge and expensive manipulandum is frequently used, requiring a large budget and wide open space. Subjects also need to travel to the laboratory, which is a burden for them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain functions, such as perception, motor control and learning, and decision making, have been explained based on a Bayesian framework, i.e., to decrease the effects of noise inherent in the human nervous system or external environment, our brain integrates sensory and a priori information in a Bayesian optimal manner.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMotor learning in unimanual and bimanual planar reaching movements has been intensively investigated. Although distinct theoretical frameworks have been proposed for each of these reaching movements, the relationship between these movements remains unclear. In particular, the generalization of motor learning effects (transfer of learning effects) between unimanual and bimanual movements has yet to be successfully explained.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSensorimotor transformation is indispensable to the accurate motion of the human body in daily life. For instance, when we grasp an object, the distance from our hands to an object needs to be calculated by integrating multisensory inputs, and our motor system needs to appropriately activate the arm and hand muscles to minimize the distance. The sensorimotor transformation is implemented in our neural systems, and recent advances in measurement techniques have revealed an important property of neural systems: a small percentage of neurons exhibits extensive activity while a large percentage shows little activity, i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF