Purpose: Prior studies report disparities in outcomes for patients cared for by trainees versus faculty physicians at academic medical centers. This study examined the effect of having a trainee as the primary care physician versus a faculty member on routine population health outcomes after adjusting for differences in social determinants of health and primary care retention.
Method: This cohort study assessed 38,404 patients receiving primary care at an academic hospital-affiliated practice by 60 faculty and 110 internal medicine trainees during academic year 2019.
Background: A frequent, preventable cause of diagnostic errors involves failure to follow up on diagnostic tests, referrals, and symptoms-termed "failure to close the diagnostic loop." This is particularly challenging in a resident practice where one third of physicians graduate annually, and rates of patient loss due to these transitions may lead to more opportunities for failure to close diagnostic loops. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of failure of loop closure in a resident primary care clinic compared to rates in the faculty practice and identify factors contributing to failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Residents serve as access points to the health care system for the most vulnerable patients in the United States. Two large academic medical centers have identified performance gaps between resident and faculty physicians. Our intent in this study was to measure the scope of resident-faculty performance gaps in a nationwide sample and identify potential targets for intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Academic health centers (AHCs) face unique challenges in providing continuity to a medically and socially complex patient population. Little is known about what drives patient loss in these settings.
Objective: Determine physician- and patient-based factors associated with patient loss in AHCs.
Background: Residents planning careers in primary care have unique training needs that are not addressed in traditional internal medicine training programs, where there is a focus on inpatient training. There are no evidence-based approaches for primary care training.
Objectives: Design and test the effect of a novel immersive primary care training program on educational and clinical outcomes.
Background: Continuity clinics are a critical component of outpatient internal medicine training. Little is known about the population of patients cared for by residents and how these physicians perform.
Objectives: To compare resident and faculty performance on standard population health measures.
Background: The flipped classroom is a teaching approach with strong evidence for effectiveness in undergraduate medical education. Objective data for its implementation in graduate medical education are limited.
Objective: We assessed the efficacy of the flipped classroom compared with standard approaches on knowledge acquisition and retention in residency education.
Background: Many experts believe that hospitals with more frequent readmissions provide lower-quality care, but little is known about how the preventability of readmissions might change over the postdischarge time frame.
Objective: To determine whether readmissions within 7 days of discharge differ from those between 8 and 30 days after discharge with respect to preventability.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Background: It is unclear if the 30-day unplanned hospital readmission rate is a plausible accountability metric.
Objective: Compare preventability of hospital readmissions, between an early period [0-7 days post-discharge] and a late period [8-30 days post-discharge]. Compare causes of readmission, and frequency of markers of clinical instability 24h prior to discharge between early and late readmissions.
Background: Early and late readmissions may have different causal factors, requiring different prevention strategies.
Objective: To determine whether predictors of readmission change within 30 days after discharge.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Background: Poor quality handoffs have been identified as a major patient safety issue. In residency programs, problematic handoffs may be an unintended consequence of duty-hour restrictions, and key data are frequently omitted from written handoffs because of the lack of standardization of content.
Objective: Determine whether an intervention that facilitates face-to-face communication supported by an electronic template improves the quality and safety of handoffs.
In this study, the ability of nitrite and nitrate to mimic the effects of estradiol on growth and gene expression was measured in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Similar to estradiol, treatment of MCF-7 cells with either 1 mumol/L nitrite or 1 mumol/L nitrate resulted in approximately 4-fold increase in cell growth and 2.3-fold to 3-fold increase in progesterone receptor (PgR), pS2, and cathepsin D mRNAs that were blocked by the antiestrogen ICI 182,780.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF