The developmental toxicity testing of biologics.

The characteristics of biologic drugs, as compared with small molecules, confer significant advantages for both the drug developer and the prospective patients. The necessity for, and the timing of, developmental toxicity testing in the preclinical program must be considered. Choice of an appropriate test system is of particular importance, one that shows pharmacodynamic activity comparable to man.

Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (version 2).

This update (Version 2) of the Terminology of Developmental Abnormalities in Common Laboratory Mammals (Version 1) incorporates improvements and enhancements to both content and organization of the terminology to enable greater flexibility in its application, while maintaining a consistent approach to the description of findings. The revisions are the result of an international collaboration among interested organizations, advised by individual experts and the outcomes of several workshops. The terminology remains organized into tables under the broad categories of external, visceral, and skeletal observations, following the manner in which data are typically collected and recorded in developmental toxicity studies.

Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (version 2).

This update (version 2) of the Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (version 1) by Wise et al. [Wise LD, Beck SL, Beltrame D, Beyer BK, Chahoud I, Clark RL, Clark R, Druga AM, Fueston MH, Guittin P, Henwood SM, Kimmel CA, Lindstrom P, Palmer AK, Petrere JA, Solomon HM, Yasuda M, York RG. Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (version 1).

Terminology of developmental abnormalities in common laboratory mammals (Version 2).

This update (Version 2) of the Terminology of Developmental Abnormalities in Common Laboratory Mammals (Version 1) by Wise et al. (1997) incorporates improvements and enhancements to both content and organization of the terminology, to enable greater flexibility in its application, while maintaining a consistent approach to the description of findings. The revisions are the result of an international collaboration among interested organizations, advised by individual experts and the outcomes of several workshops.

Analysis and integration of developmental neurotoxicity and ancillary data into risk assessment: a case study of dimethoate.

Dimethoate is an organophosphate (OP) pesticide used to control a wide variety of insects on agricultural crops and ornamentals. To ensure that dimethoate is used safely, it is important to determine exposure levels that protect against adverse effects at all life stages, including the developing fetus, infant, and child. Based on an analysis of a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) study, a cholinesterase (ChE) sensitivity study, a cross-fostering study, and several single- and multigenerational reproductive toxicity studies, two potential critical endpoints for dimethoate were identified: brain ChE inhibition (ChEI) in adult females, and pup mortality.

Determining normal variability in a developmental neurotoxicity test: a report from the ILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute expert working group on neurodevelopmental endpoints.

With the implementation of the Food Quality Protection Act in 1996, more detailed evaluations of possible health effects of pesticides on developing organisms have been required. As a result, considerable developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) data have been generated on a variety of endpoints, including developmental changes in motor activity, auditory startle habituation, and various learning and memory parameters. One issue in interpreting these data is the level of variability for the measures used in these studies: excessive variability can obscure treatment-related effects, or conversely, small but statistically significant changes could be viewed as treatment related, when they might in fact be within the normal range.