Publications by authors named "Katherine D Walker"

Background: Despite a vast air pollution epidemiology literature to date and the recognition that lower-socioeconomic status (SES) populations are often disproportionately exposed to pollution, there is little research identifying optimal means of adjusting for confounding by SES in air pollution epidemiology, nor is there a strong understanding of biases that may result from improper adjustment.

Objective: We aim to provide a conceptualization of SES and a review of approaches to its measurement in the U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM) is a major global health concern. Quantitative estimates of attributable mortality are based on disease-specific hazard ratio models that incorporate risk information from multiple PM sources (outdoor and indoor air pollution from use of solid fuels and secondhand and active smoking), requiring assumptions about equivalent exposure and toxicity. We relax these contentious assumptions by constructing a PM-mortality hazard ratio function based only on cohort studies of outdoor air pollution that covers the global exposure range.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The review looks at how air quality changes affect people's health and what the Health Effects Institute (HEI) has learned from studying this.
  • Most studies have focused on short-term actions but not on big, long-term programs, which makes understanding the effects harder.
  • New ways to study these issues are being developed, like using special methods to find out how air quality changes relate to health, and it’s important to think about social factors and climate impacts too.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this paper, we present findings from a multiyear expert judgment study that comprehensively characterizes uncertainty in estimates of mortality reductions associated with decreases in fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) in the U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The recent movement of regulatory agencies toward probabilistic analyses of human health and environmental risks has focused greater attention on the quality of the estimates of variability and uncertainty that underlie them. Of particular concern is how uncertainty--a measure of what is not known--is characterized, as uncertainty can play an influential role in analyses of the need for regulatory controls or in estimates of the economic value of additional research. This paper reports the second phase of a study, conducted as an element of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS), to obtain and calibrate exposure assessment experts judgments about uncertainty in residential ambient, residential indoor, and personal air benzene concentrations experienced by the nonsmoking, nonoccupationally exposed population in U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF