A prospective randomized evaluation of VV delay optimization in CRT-D recipients: echocardiographic observations from the RHYTHM II ICD study.

Background: All current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices allow the programming of the atrioventricular (AV/PV) delays and the sequential stimulation of the ventricles via the inter ventricular (VV) delay.

Aim: This post hoc analysis of the RHYTHM II study was conducted to compare the reverse remodeling associated with VV delay optimization in patients randomly assigned to simultaneous (SIM) biventricular stimulation versus patients assigned to optimized VV delay programming (OPT) (1:3 randomization scheme).

Methods: The analysis included 14 patients assigned to the SIM group and 34 patients to the OPT group who completed the 6-month follow-up period with paired echocardiographic recordings.

Randomized comparison of simultaneous biventricular stimulation versus optimized interventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Resynchronization for the HemodYnamic Treatment for Heart Failure Management II implantable cardioverter defibrillator (RHYTHM II ICD) study.

Background: The clinical value of interventricular (V-V) delay optimization in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) undergoing implantation of a device for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been clearly demonstrated.

Methods: RHYTHM II was a single-blind randomized trial including 121 recipients of a device for CRT with cardioverter/defibrillator capabilities (CRT-D) randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to simultaneous (n = 30) versus optimized (OPT) (n = 91) biventricular pacing. V-V delay was optimized by echocardiography.

Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial.

Background: External cardioversion is a readily available treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation. Although anatomical and electrophysiological considerations suggest that an anterior-posterior electrode position should create a more homogeneous shock-field gradient throughout the atria than an anterior-lateral position, both electrode positions are equally recommended for external cardioversion in current guidelines. We undertook a randomised trial comparing the two positions with the endpoint of successful cardioversion.