Publications by authors named "Karin F Bach"

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to identify and quantify the barriers that prevent academic drug trials from being published, focusing on trials approved by the Danish Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2007.
  • Out of 181 trials, 139 completed surveys, revealing high initiation (92%) and completion rates (93%), but only 73% of completed trials were published, with randomized controlled trials being published slightly faster.
  • The primary identified barriers to publication relate to the process following trial completion, suggesting that research institutions and funders should enforce publication requirements to improve outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS) and Biopeople at the University of Copenhagen held a workshop in May 2015 titled "Patient Involvement in Medicines Development and Approvals: A Paradigm Shift Towards True Patient Impact in Medicines Development and Regulatory Science" that acknowledged the importance of having patients more involved in the entire process of medicines research and development (R&D) and life cycle management. Four key stakeholders, representing patients, academia, industry, and regulatory authorities, each gave their view and perspective on the status and challenges of current patient involvement. From the 3 breakout sessions, it was concluded that patient-reported outcomes (ie, the report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else), was considered as an important tool when deciding endpoints.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Unacknowledged inconsistencies in the reporting of clinical trials undermine the validity of the results of the trials. Little is known about inconsistency in the reporting of academic clinical drug trials. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of consistency between protocols and published reports of academic clinical drug trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We present a commentary on the international aspects of the evolution of regulatory science as a multidisciplinary, multistakeholder academic discipline of education and applied research emphasizing the need for seamless interaction between stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, the pharmaceutical industry, universities, payers, and patient organizations. Regulatory science is the science of developing new tools, standards, and approaches to evaluate the efficacy, safety, quality, and performance of medical products in order to assess benefit/risk and facilitate a sound and transparent regulatory decision making throughout development and life cycle management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A proposal for a new regulation on clinical trials that will replace the Clinical Trials Directive has been launched by the EU Commission the 17 July 2012. The proposal contains ideas that undoubtedly will lead to a greater harmonisation within the EU, a more smooth approval procedure, and a lowering of the administrative burden. Details are still to be discussed, and waiting until 2016 when the new rules are adopted is definitely a problem, but all together the new proposal is to be regarded as good news for clinical drug research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the temporal trends in characteristics of academic clinical drug trials. We here report characteristics on trial methodology.

Methods: A review of 386 approved applications of academic clinical drug trials submitted to the Danish Medicines Agency 1993-2005 was carried out.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Since 2004, adherence to Good Clinical Practice has been mandatory for all clinical drug trials. This was new to the investigator-initiated trials. Our study showed no association between the implementation of the Directive and investigator or industry-initiated trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To determine the impact of the European Union's Clinical Trials Directive on the number of academic drug trials carried out in Denmark.

Design: Retrospective review of applications for drug trials to the Danish Medicines Agency, 1993-2006.

Review Methods: Applications for drug trials for alternate years were classified as academic or commercial trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

By May 2004, all clinical trials in the European Union (EU) on medicinal products have to be initiated and conducted in compliance with the principles in the new directive on Good Clinical Practice (GCP). This requirement will also apply to non-commercial trials involving registered drugs and may therefore restrain the academic clinical drug research. In Denmark, three public GCP units connected in a national network and associated with the university hospitals in Copenhagen, Odense and Aarhus have been established.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF