Background: New generation bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) promise to improve the outcomes of current generation BRS technologies by decreasing wall thickness while maintaining structural strength. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical behavior and vascular healing profile of a novel thin-walled (98 μm) sirolimus-eluting ultrahigh molecular weight BRS (Magnitude, Amaranth Medical) to the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Abbott Vascular).
Methods And Results: In vitro biomechanical testing showed lower number of fractures on accelerated cycle testing over time (at 21K cycles = 20.
Objectives: In this first-in-human study, we prospectively studied the vascular compatibility and mechanical performance of a novel bare ultra-high molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable scaffold (BRS, FORTITUDE®, Amaranth Medical, Mountain View, California) up to two years after implantation using multimodality imaging techniques.
Background: The vascular biocompatibility of polymers used in BRS has not been fully characterized in the absence of anti-proliferative drugs.
Methods: A total of 10 patients undergoing single scaffold implantation were included in the final analysis and were followed up using optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 2-years.
Background: Mechanical strength of bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) is highly dependent on strut dimensions and polymer features. To date, the successful development of thin-walled BRS has been challenging. We compared the biomechanical behavior and vascular healing profile of a novel thin-walled (115 µm) sirolimus-eluting ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous poly-l-lactic acid-based BRS (APTITUDE, Amaranth Medical [AMA]) to Absorb (bioresorbable vascular scaffold [BVS]) using different experimental models.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties and healing pattern of novel sirolimus-eluting, ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous poly-L-lactic acid bioresorbable scaffolds (S-BRS) that have been postdilated by 0.55 and 0.8 mm beyond the nominal diameters within the pressure-diameter compliance chart range.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAims: The vascular healing profile of polymers used in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) has not been fully characterised in the absence of antiproliferative drugs. In this study, we aimed to compare the polymer biocompatibility profile and vascular healing response of a novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA BRS (FORTITUDE®; Amaranth Medical, Mountain View, CA, USA) against bare metal stent (BMS) controls in porcine coronary arteries.
Methods And Results: Following device implantation, optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation was performed at 0 and 28 days, and at one, two, three and four years.
Background: Clinically available bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) rely on polymer crystallinity to achieve mechanical strength resulting in limited overexpansion capabilities and structural integrity when exposed to high-loading conditions. We aimed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior and vascular healing profile of a novel, sirolimus-eluting, high-molecular-weight, amorphous poly-l-lactic acid-based BRS (Amaranth BRS).
Methods And Results: In vitro biomechanical testing was performed under static and cyclic conditions.
Objective: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has developed into a therapeutic alternative to shunting for the management of carefully selected patients with primarily noncommunicating hydrocephalus. This procedure, however, requires a general anesthetic and necessitates violation of the brain parenchyma and manipulation near vital neural structures to access the floor of the third ventricle. Using two cadavers and off-the-shelf angiographic catheters, we sought to determine whether it was possible to navigate a catheter, angioplasty balloon, and stent percutaneously through the subarachnoid space from the thecal sac into the third ventricle so as to perform a third ventriculostomy from below.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF