Optometry Australia's infection control guidelines 2020.

Optometry Australia's infection control guidelines 2020 deliver a revision of the paper: Infection control guidelines for optometrists 2016. A review of recent literature was undertaken, with information collected from peer-reviewed journal articles, guidelines from professional societies, government health departments and instructions from equipment manufacturers. This information was used to provide an update on current infection control best practice.

Infection control guidelines for optometrists 2016.

Background: This paper provides an updated version of the paper: Infection control guidelines for optometrists 2007.

Methods: Information from peer-reviewed journal articles, guidelines from professional societies, and government health department and other websites and instructions from equipment manufacturers were considered in determining infection risk factors in optometric practice. They were used to revise the recommendations on disinfection, sterilisation and reprocessing procedures for instrumentation and other equipment used in optometric practice as well as personal infection control measures to be undertaken by staff.

Influenza A(H1N1) and infection control guidelines for optometrists.

The emergence of a novel influenza A virus (Influenza A[H1N1]), which has not circulated previously in humans, has led to the first global influenza pandemic in 41 years. Influenza A(H1N1), commonly called 'swine flu', is a novel influenza virus made up of porcine, avian and human genes, and preferentially infects younger people. Although Influenza A(H1N1) does not appear to be likely to cause as many fatalities as previous influenza pandemics, attempts to contain it are necessary because people whose health is already compromised through underlying chronic medical conditions are at risk of death if they contract the virus.

Color vision assessment by Farnsworth lantern: results using alternative pass-fail criteria.

Introduction: The Farnsworth lantern is used in the United States and Australia to assess pilot applicants who have deficient color vision (DCV). Its efficacy was questioned following a crash in July 2002 because the DCV pilot confused the red and white approach path signals, despite having passed the Farnsworth test. The Farnsworth lights are larger and brighter than many aviation signals and it has a higher pass rate than the lantern tests used in other countries.

Infection control guidelines for optometrists 2007.

Information from peer-reviewed articles, guidelines from professional societies and manufacturers' instructions were considered to determine the risk factors in optometric practice and to make recommendations for disinfection, sterilisation and reprocessing of instrumentation and other equipment used in practice and measures for personal protection. Wherever possible, all practitioners should adopt measures to decrease the risk of transmission of infection, such as single use instruments/equipment, appropriate methods of reprocessing where items are reused, routine employment of standard infection control precautions and application of more rigorous procedures for infected or immuno-suppressed individuals.

Using clinical tests of colour vision to predict the ability of colour vision deficient patients to name surface colours.

Purpose: To determine the predictive power of commonly used tests for abnormal colour vision to identify patients who can or cannot name surface colours without error.

Methods: The colour vision of 99 subjects with colour vision deficiency (CVD) was assessed using the Ishihara, the Richmond HRR (2002), the Farnsworth D15, the Medmont C100 and the Nagel anomaloscope. They named 10 surface colours (red, orange, brown, yellow, green, blue, purple, white, grey and black), which were presented in two shapes (lines and dots) and three sizes.

Can color vision defective subjects who pass the farnsworth lantern test recognize surface color codes?

Introduction: The International Civil Aviation Organization requires that pilots be able to distinguish the colors used in air navigation and in particular be able to identify the colors of signal lights. Most national aviation authorities use a lantern test to assess the ability of applicants for a pilot's license who have abnormal color vision to recognize the colors of signal lights. However, color-coding is now widely used in aviation systems other than signal lights.

Categorical color naming of surface color codes by people with abnormal color vision.

Purpose: Past investigations of the ability of people with color vision deficiency (CVD) to name the colors of surface colors have been occupation-specific. This study was undertaken as a more generalized investigation to explore particularly the effects of stimulus size and shape.

Methods: One hundred CVD observers and 20 color vision normal (CVN) subjects named the colors of two sets of surface colors, each set presenting the same 10 colors (red, orange, brown, yellow, green, blue, purple, white, gray, black).

Color vision assessment: fail rates of two versions of the Farnsworth lantern test.

Introduction: The Farnsworth lantern test has long been used to assess the color vision of those seeking to enter the aviation industry and other occupations that require recognition of signal lights. A new version of the Farnsworth lantern, the Optec 900, is now produced because the original version is no longer manufactured. This paper reports the pass/ fail rates of a production model of the new version compared with an original one.

Search for coloured objects in natural surroundings by people with abnormal colour vision.

Background: People with abnormal colour vision often report difficulty seeing coloured berries and flowers in foliage, which suggests they will have a diminished capacity for visual search when target objects are marked out by colour. There is very little experimental evidence of the effect of abnormal colour vision on visual search and none relating to search for objects in natural foliage.

Method: We showed 79 subjects with abnormal colour vision (seven protanopes, 10 deuteranopes, 16 protanomals and 46 deuteranomals) and 20 subjects with normal colour vision photographs of natural scenes and asked them to locate clumps of red berries, to trace the length of a red string on grass and to name the season depicted in a photograph taken in the Autumn and the same scene photographed in the Summer.

The new Richmond HRR pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is better than the Ishihara test.

Aim: The Hardy-Rand-Rittler (HRR) pseudoisochromatic test for colour vision is highly regarded but has long been out of print. Richmond Products produced a new edition in 2002 that has been re-engineered to rectify shortcomings of the original test. This study is a validation trial of the new test using a larger sample and different criteria of evaluation from those of the previously reported validation study.